United States | News & Politics

7213 readers

434 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 4 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's why I'm not voting for either genocider/pro-genocider.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That's like opting to do nothing and get force fed a bag of broken glass when the options were eat a plastic bag or eat a plastic bag full of glass.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

Rest easy, they're in California, so their vote doesn't matter anyway.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Nice to know genocide isn't the red line for some people.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You are completely (and very possibly intentionally) missing the point. Either way, I have no interest in continuing this conversation so byeeeeee!

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

kthx bye.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

When the options are less genocide and more genocide, you're ok with not standing against the more genocide candidate and letting them win.

Seems like genocide isn't as big of a red line as you say it is if you don't care to lessen it.