this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
1286 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

5232 readers
2011 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes. I’m not sure why that needs to be pointed out?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Probably why when the slaver’s college was being debated the “let’s not concentrate political power in a few northeastern cities” argument held more sway.

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Political voting power shifting to cities is only very recent?

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago

I mean if by very recent you mean around the 60’s sure. But that’s still for like 20% of this country’s existence. Early in the country’s history New York/Boston/Philadelphia also had a lot of power in deciding who became president.

[–] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm ancient times, people outside city walls weren't even allowed to vote. Add in the fact that humanity is tribal in nature, and your statement holds even less true.

You think the peasants outside city walls were even allowed to vote on anything? They were literally outsiders that knew little to nothing about the inner (more populated) parts of cities.

A city's overall opinion is literally more important than rural mud slinging opinion, if for no other reason than because more people live there, and are affected by policy.

Edit: sorry for being mean

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I wasn't trying to create polemic. I'm well aware that for most of history democratic voting wasn't a thing.

Just wanted to add a bit of context, yes, by population city opinion is more important NOW, but until very recently, considering strictly population, it was not, and the current political tensions are in part caused by this change.

I wish respectful conversation, sorry if I seemed rude.

[–] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry if I seemed rude. Ignoring life problems, I'm not great at talking to people or voicing my thoughts, I just get really angry over things since a car wreck a couple years ago. Like all my feelings towards anything at all have been amplified. I do genuinely hope you have a good rest of your day.

I do still feel that your statement on the matter excludes the fact that, since the dawn of history, the town/city has been infinitely more relevant to voting matters than rural could ever be. As I said, the people living outside the city walls were irrelevant to practical sociopolitical matters.

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 2 points 2 months ago

Certainly, but in the context of democracies, the rural people were made very relevant, being the majority, but now are being pushed back into being irrelevant, and are angry about it.

I too wish you a good rest of the day, and a wonderful weekend, and may you come across people that stand with you so you can feel better.