this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
629 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2454 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Travelers can opt out of facial recognition at US airports by requesting manual ID verification, though resistance or intimidation may occur.
  • Facial recognition poses privacy risks, including potential data breaches, misidentification, and normalization of surveillance.
  • The Algorithmic Justice League's "Freedom Flyers" campaign aims to raise awareness of these issues and encourage passengers to exercise their right to opt out.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] credo@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I’m okay with the TSA scan (pre-check) since.. you know.. they already have you if you took a picture for your ID.

Those “clear” people however. Who TF thinks it’s a good idea to hand your biometric info to a corp?

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As I said. They already have it.

[–] techt@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Isn't reducing the size of the dataset worth it? I'd rather them have a picture from three years ago than a new scan every month or two.

[–] Zectivi@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

Clear is now a TSA “vendor” for the precheck process. The machines they use for the sign up process - at least the airport I was at - don’t have the eye scanning camera in the kiosk.

The Clear representative I was asking questions of had said they don’t require eye scans for Clear, though that is the default. People can ask to use just fingerprints, which he said does disrupt the terminal process as the agents don’t think to ask if fingerprints were what was registered when the eye scans fail.

I am not advocating for Clear. I refuse to use them. I simply do want to call out that they are one of 3 who handle the process for the TSA now. People do have a choice of which of the three to use.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 9 points 3 months ago

There's no way my ID photo would work for facial recognition. I don't plan on giving them anything new before I'm forced to

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How did you get into TSA Pre without providing fingerprints? I tried once, and they strictly refused to let me apply because I wouldn't give fingerprints.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, I’ve had DLs in multiple states and they all required fingerprints. The little digital ones. Maybe that’s not the case everywhere though.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, weird. They don't require prints for a DL in TX, but we're already closing in on an authoritarian state anyways. I didn't know this was a thing.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It probably has to do with whether the driver's license is Real ID compliant or not. Here in Minnesota, you have the option of getting the Real ID license that can be used as a federal ID card for things like flying, or the regular old driver's license which soon will really only be good for showing you're allowed to drive a car.

I only have the regular driver's license so I don't know what all getting the Read ID involves, but having your biometric data scanned and stored seems like something they'd require.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Texas is real id compliant. Has been for like seven years iirc

I'm in Utah and have a "real ID" or whatever (the little gold star) and never had my fingerprints taken, eyes scanned, etc. If they required that, I'd say no and just use my passport instead, which also didn't require biometrics.