this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
117 points (97.6% liked)

News

23274 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

She was criticized for failing to prevent the assassination attempt on Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

No one was fired after Kennedy or Reagan got shot.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

No one was trying to be a world famous media congress critter, neither.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Denying the request for more security is the problem here, I think.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are legitimate reasons for denying increased security. One of them is the Congressional favorite excuse for things not being done that should be, the budget. If there isn't the budget for increased security, then a denial would be expected. A very vocal portion of Congress loves to talk about their about shrinking the budget all the damned time. One of the consequences of that is not having the budget to react to changing circumstances.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe so, but she is still the one who took the heat for it. And the buck sort of stops with her here.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

It does, because that's what department heads do, they take the fall in situations like this. Even if the root cause wasn't related to them. It's an expectation of the position.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The response to those shootings was exactly by the book while the response in Trump's case was sheer incompetence. You can't control the shooter, but you can control the readiness and response and those were abysmal this time.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems like you're saying two different things. Isn't "by the book" almost the opposite of "sheer incompetence"?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if you saw my edit that tries to clarify this point. The two attacks mentioned had secret service handle things by the book and no one got fired. This time with the Trump attack, was the opposite. Sorry for any confusion.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago

Ah, yeah, that clears things up.