this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1340 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

5404 readers
3307 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mio@feddit.nu 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Keep the price low for medic and increase the tax on sugar.

[–] Vigge93@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not all diabetes is caused by excess sugar intake

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Diabetes is simply not caused by excess sugar intake. People still keep parroting this misinformation and probably always will.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Being overweight (BMI 25 to 30) doubles your chances of becoming a Type II diabetic. Being obese (BMI 30+) basically guarantees you'll become a Type II diabetic. Excess sugar intake will make you overweight or obese, so it's hardly misinformation parroting to say that excess sugar intake causes diabetes, even though a) there are other ways to become overweight besides excess sugar intake, b) it's possible to get Type II diabetes without being overweight, and c) not all diabetics are Type II.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

People with high metabolism and high sugar intake are highly unlikely to develops diabetes. High sugar intake is not a cause of diabetes. Might as well say hamburgers or not walking causes diabetes as those are exactly as accurate as saying sugar causes it.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago

We've got a High-Fructose Corn Syrup fan here

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Sure, that's fine. Calories in vs calories out.

In the case of type 2 diabetics, obesity is usually a large factor (no pun intended). If you're able to consume large quantities of sugar and stay in shape (BMI below 25), then you're probably fine.

Type 2 diabetes is, by definition, insufficient insulin to push blood sugars into the cells of the body. That's very sugar-related. More body, and more sugars means more insulin is needed. Once it exceeds the ability of the pancreas, you have type 2 diabetes, regardless of BMI or obesity.

What I'm saying is, you don't need to be obese to have diabetes, even type 2 diabetes.

The existence of type 1 diabetes, however, kind of makes all of this commentary, fairly moot. T1D persons simply cannot live without insulin. So logically, what society is saying by not capping insulin costs is that the lives of type 1 diabetics and the well-being of type 2 diabetics, is less important than money.

And that's what all this discourse boils down to.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 2 points 3 months ago

diabetes

I did not know that. But I still think it is a good idea.