86
Go figure. (feddit.uk)
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

that is just sad. yet so many will say sexism does not exist

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago

Pretty sure racism is also involved

[-] ReiRose@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Intersectionality

[-] tquid@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

It's as if, like, if you are a woman, and also in a disfavoured racial category, like, where they, uh, have overlap? Where they meet? It's not the same as either one individually but its own, I guess nexus? I feel like there's a better word for this

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it's called a "double minority", but being a woman isn't really a minority tho (edit: not a minority in the context of being 50% of the human population) so I don't know if theres a better term than that.

I feel bad for people who are black, lesbian, neurodivergent, and trans-woman... like that's a quadruple minority.

[-] ReiRose@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

That's not what minority means in the sociological context. Volume is mathematical. Poor people are a minority and there's more of them than the 1%. Being a minority is about lack of power, prestige and property. And intersectionality is the more formal term, but 'double minority' gets the point across.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago

@ReiRose@lemmy.world has it right, the term and idea is intersectionality.

apropos of nothing, intersectionality came out of critical race theory's analyses of black womens outcomes in the legal system. the particular combination of oppression is literally the textbook example.

[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, online gaming has all but confirmed to me that sexism is very alive and well.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

This is also common in the guitar community. Some women can shred like mofos, and here comes Jim-Bob McGraw saying their playing is tracked etc., ad nauseum

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net -1 points 11 months ago

Can... Can I be the one sitting in that chair? (⁠。⁠♡⁠‿⁠♡⁠。⁠)

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

The funny thing is that in my experience female programmers usually have above average skills. I suspect it’s exactly because of this bias against women in tech. Where an average or below average dude can easily get by, this is much harder for women. As a result this bias acts as a kind of filter which results in female programmers being on average a little better than male programmers because all the average or below average ones get filtered out early.

[-] Jonna@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Here's hard data to match your experience:

"This paper presents the largest study to date on gender bias, where we compare acceptance rates of contributions from men versus women in an open source software community. Surprisingly, our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's. However, women's acceptance rates are higher only when they are not identifiable as women. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless."

https://peerj.com/preprints/1733/

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

That's probably just because women are smarter than men.

[-] 6mementomori@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I might add, in the hostile environment women may feel compelled to try harder at least to make a point. As in, "I'll show you what I can do".

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone -1 points 11 months ago

Even more rage inducing these comments would be the same if she wasn't conventionally attractive.

Fucking programmers need a solid clip around the ear.

[-] Cubes@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Tbf, the original photo was already discounting her abilities. Saying "can program code" for a lead SWE is saying like "can do calculus" for a physicist.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago

Also, once you're moderately good at programming, language doesn't matter much. You can pick up a new high level language relatively easily if needed. Low level languages might be harder for some people though, because it takes a fairly different mindset. Personally, I love low level programming, though it's not very time efficient to write.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Yeah, once you've got a few languages under your belt, it's all about concepts. If you end up learning a new language that follows completely different paradigms, you are back to square one. But most of the time you can go like "Ah, so concept X of the new language works similar to concept Y of that language I already know."

[-] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

I was so glad we had a woman join our dev team some months ago. It's more fun, more relaxed and we are able to get better results as we just cover a wider area of skills. People gatekeeping programming to include only men are idiots.

[-] girltwink@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That poor girl. My gf's only female teammate quit last month and i suggested she start grinding leetcode asap. Could you imagine being the only woman on a team? Pretty strong indicator that something is very wrong there.

[-] JDubbleu@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Eh, my team is this way, but it's because we're aerospace adjacent which further compounds the problem. The only woman on our team is awesome and everyone gets along great. No one has an inflated ego or feels the need to one up each other though, which tends to be the root of the issue in my experience. Lots of tech bros feel the need to put others down, and see women as an easier target unfortunately.

[-] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

How the hell does she program in mips? I thought that was a unit of measurement

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

841st fastest growing company in the us

Weird flex, but ok

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

So is "I have X points on Stack Overflow".

Also, I'm on the iOS tutorial team for somethingorother.com.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nope, not really.

Ain’t to many shitposts on stackoverflow and the raywenderlich website is one of the best ios programming resources. This shit is respectable.

[-] kicksystem@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

27k points on SO is respectable. I've got 20k and that wasn't easy. There are shortcuts, but to find those you've also got to be clever.

[-] ApeCavalryArt@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Whenever I see someone taking down these absolute bottom of the barrel incel dork on social media, it just feels like shoo-ing a squirrel off the bird feeder. Just not even worth taking action

[-] ClarissaXDarjeeling@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'd be impressed by anyone who could "Hello, world" in MIPS

[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

A hello world in MIPS is impressive by itself.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Am I the only one that doesn't think it's a waste if a gorgeous person does modeling/acting? If I had a body people wanted to ogle I would be using that power 24/7 instead of sitting here in a shitty office under fluorescent lights pretending to care about work while they pretend to care about me.

[-] Ambiorickx@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

She makes a valid point, but on the other hand, she causes funny feelies in the incels’ pantsal region.

[-] Norgur@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

That is exactly what they would make up for a headline... Yeah, of course, guys...

[-] weariedfae@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

ITT: basically a reddit comment section on a post with any woman.

Guess the "it feels like Lemmy is more positive" days are over. So it goes.

[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What are you talking about? Literally every post with more score than yours is positive and mocking the bigots in the post.

If anything a statement like this reminds me of reddit where <1% has voted and commented but some bad takes are already attributed to the other 99%. (But the good comments are also way older than your post...)

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

ITT: people getting upvoted for whining about posts from fragile males, while the few such posts are downvoted to oblivion.

[-] Larry@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Every top comment is positive, are you deliberately sorting by controversial?

[-] weariedfae@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The post looked different 9 months ago.

[-] Larry@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I didn't realize I was sorting by top of all time, that's my dumbassery at play 😅

[-] lemann@lemmy.one -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah there's a surprising amount of 💩 takes in the comments... considering this blew up and the type of community it is, I'd guess the majority of normies are here too

[-] 2ez@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Some fragile male egos in this thread. Looking forward to your complaints about the Barbie movie. Sad and pathetic.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

I don't know what you're talking about. For me the fragile egos are way down the thread, all massively downvoted. The absolute majority is supportive.

[-] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Why would anyone care about an hour-long toy commercial?

[-] Ticktok@lemmy.one 0 points 11 months ago

Because that's not what the movie is at all. It actually spends a fair amount of time mocking consumerism and hating on the negative impact barbie has had on women's self image and feminism. It's actually pretty crass with a lot of offcolor jokes. It's more targeted to adults who had Barbies as kids during on the 80s/90s.

[-] funkless@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I did the Barbenheimer double bill. The one that felt like a.commercial was the "YU ESS EH" nature of promoting American War interests.

[-] tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

Oppenheimer forces the viewer to strongly consider the awful thing that was done those two days.

I'm as critical of the US as anyone I've met but your take is bizarrely ignorant to what they were trying to do. I feel like you'd have to be intentionally missing the point to come away thinking that movie was pro-america in any way.

[-] macrocephalic@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Basically they're scared and intimidated. Here is a person who is beautiful and intelligent and has made something of herself and that highlights their own inabilities.

I think sexism is only part of the problem, they'd have a similar response to a male model who had a successful tech career.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
86 points (95.7% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3753 readers
2 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS