10
submitted 2 months ago by mwguy@infosec.pub to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 4am@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

Nate “oh they don’t know why they’re Protesting, it’s just trendy” Silver? The guy who hasn’t been right about the last like 2-3 elections? That Nate Silver?

Forgive me if he doesn’t fool me into loaning him some VC money. The fucking Theranos of statistics.

[-] triptrapper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

At best he misinterprets his data, and at worst he deliberately misinterprets them to fit an agenda. Many of his takes are subjective and meaningless. "My data show that Biden's chance of winning Wisconsin is... 'medium' to 'pretty good.'"

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

Isn't that something he normally admits to (or at least he did back when he was with 538). That the value of the "Horse race" election reporting was essentially nil as long as the percentage of undecided voters was greater than the margin (+error) between the candidates.

[-] natural_motions@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 months ago

This guy the day after Biden loses "Those damn GenZ and Millenials!!! You cost us the election!!!1"

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

This is Nate Silver, his takes are essentially always more nuanced and data driven than that. I'd expect some random MSNBC/CNN talking head to say that; not Silver.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Is there an easy way to block one publication from appearing in my feed, this guy isn't worth listening to any more

[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

Not that I know of but tbh, you should look at blocking the entity that brought this into lemmy/your life.
You can block the user if he enters articles or info you want to dismiss. For me it's entirely a valid thing to do as gaining control over who gets to enter your information space is your prerogative.

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

I don't think that feature exists yet.

But more inquisitively why do you dislike Silver? He's generally been the "gold standard" when it comes to data driven political analysis.

[-] Dempf@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Why not? I thought fivethirtyeight helped me get a handle on the political odds in 2020 and 2022.

[-] bquintb@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

Oh ok, thanks Nate Silver

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
10 points (61.9% liked)

politics

18073 readers
3173 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS