I didn't hear about this when it originally happened. Not enough detail in the article to understand what actually happened.
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
93 points (96.0% liked)
politics
18863 readers
3855 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
- Scott Smith's daughter was allegedly assaulted in a bathroom by someone identifying as genderfluid
- At a school board meeting, Smith got into an argument with a woman, I guess related to this incident in some way, during which he was arguing loudly, clenching his fist, leaning toward and swearing at the woman.
- Deputies arrested him, taking him to the ground and busting his face up a little bit
- He struggled with the deputies while being removed, and video got distributed of him with a bloodied face struggling and threatening to "kick their teeth in"
- He was found guilty of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest
- The governor of Virginia pardoned him
Basically, Republicans were super excited about this whole thing because it backs up two things they particularly like: (1) A rare and exciting confirmation of their almost-totally-hallucinatory claim that we urgently need to keep transgender people out of bathrooms to protect the children (2) People on their team being above the law, and justified in violently resisting law enforcement if someone tries to subject them to the same rules as everyone else (the fascist playbook of replacing "what did you do?" with "which team are you on?" when deciding whether someone is guilty of a crime).
I can understand why the father lost his shit over his daughter being sexually assaulted kn a bathroom. The governor is slimy as shit for taking advantage of the situation. But trans or not, the school fucked up in how they handled the situation.
IDK anything about how this particular school handled this particular situation, but I genuinely can't think offhand of even a single situation where a school at any level properly handled a physical or sexual assault on their campus. Just call the cops. It's a crime, fuck the school administration, deal with the system that at least has a track record of prosecuting in a meaningful way some nonzero percent of the cases of assault that they come in contact with. You can keep the school administration informed of what you're doing, or not, and ask or subpoena them for information, according to what you feel is necessary.
The daughter of the man arrested was raped in her High School bathroom by another student. Apparently the rapist is trans and so Youngkin, who was the republican candidate for governor at the time, used this as a major talking point for his campaign “democrats want your daughters to share bathrooms with rapists”. Youngkin was elected as Governor and this was probably a large reason for his election. It seems like Youngkin is now reminding everyone of this whole event, and where his beliefs remain on this particular subject.
Apparently the rapist is trans
According to the article,
The case galvanized conservatives nationwide when reports spread that the cisgender male student wore a skirt during the first attack.
Yeah, sorry I was going off of memory. I remember the whole “issue” seemed half baked, and there were mixed reports at the time.
Why does this remind me of one of the school shootings where reports came out that the shooter was autistic and suddenly all the media had reports on "how autistic people can be violent."
I'm autistic and most times autistic people are victims of violence, not the ones committing acts of violence. But this possible exception happens and there's a group ready to portay all autistic people as violent just like there was a group ready to use this possible exception to label all genderfluid people as rapists.
That's super slimy. I still would probably lose my shit the way the father did at the school board meeting. But it certainly isn't because the person is trans.
Yeah, the school board actually did some seedy shit to try and downplay the issue. The superintendent and others were fired and might be awaiting criminal trials. The father was totally justified being angry.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The episode featured prominently throughout the gubernatorial campaign that year for Youngkin, who has made support for the so-called “parents’ rights” movement a cornerstone of his political brand.
In a statement released Sunday, Smith vowed to pursue legal action against Loudoun County Public Schools and continue fighting “for parents and their children.” The district did not immediately respond to a phone call and email requesting a response.
But Loudoun County Commonwealth’s Attorney Buta Biberaj said Sunday that Youngkin was interfering in the case for “political gain” before the start of early voting in legislative elections.
The teenager convicted of assaulting Smith’s daughter was later found guilty of forcibly touching another classmate at a nearby school where the perpetrator was allowed to attend classes while awaiting trial in juvenile court.
Model policies posted last fall by the Virginia Department of Education say students use of bathroom and locker facilities should be based on biological sex and that minors must be referred to by the name and pronouns in their official records, unless a parent approves otherwise.
The grand jury’s scathing report accused the school system of mishandling the teenage perpetrator and said authorities ignored multiple warning signs that could have prevented the second assault.
The original article contains 577 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Seems like a good pardon. I still don’t like Youngkin though.