this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
177 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18637 readers
3723 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"There, I fixed it." - Ron DaSantis

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just like trump's "don't count the sick people and we'll have less sick people."

Just because you shut your eyes and ears doesn't mean the problem went away. But that's the best you can expect coming from republicans these days.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

YES IT DOES! LALALALALALALALALA!

[–] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago

I mean, they kinda got it figured out. They don't even have to acknowledge climate change, if hurricanes threaten Florida they can simply redraw the path of the hurricane with a sharpie. Checkmate, liberals.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

not going to help businesses ignore the fact its happening. hows your insurance market defuckface?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Gonna build a beach house 5 miles inland and wait a few years.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The peninsula and archipelago state that is statistically most affected by hurricanes, with the majority of its southern coast at less than 4’ (1.2M) elevation, that is already getting gouged by insurance companies, is ignoring climate change.

Bold strategy, Cotton.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I’m not a geologist by any means but isn’t South Florida uniquely screwed by rising sea levels? I’ve read articles about it basically being a geology problem. There’s a layer of porous limestone on top of the bedrock there. So, the types of flood protection you see in the Netherlands, Southeast Louisiana, etc. (levees, sea walls, pumps, etc.) aren’t possible.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yep. And they're already fighting a losing battle against sea water getting into their freshwater supply. There will come a day when the sea levels have risen enough to make Florida tap water not potable throughout the state.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago

Yes, you have a reasonably accurate description of the problem. It is possible to buy some years of additional use of some areas (eg: parts of Miami) using pumps to move water back out.

[–] Vector@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn't like the movie, the message was okay.

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Not trolling, genuinely couldn't stand that movie, I feel it's impossible to bring people around to the idea that it was a shit movie, and I don't need people to feel the same way about it as me to validate my feelings, but I do support the message that it was trying to send (people will remain willfully ignorant) but it didn't send that message in a way that made sense (from a pretty typical progressive). I barely made it through the first viewing, and I'm not giving it another chance.

But sure, I'm a troll, and a bad one at that.

For other things I troll about be sure to check out my review of "rampage", oh wait, that was heartfelt and the person who took my recommendation ended up loving it (inexplicably, I cannot explain why it's so damn... Rampage), and maybe reconsider that while my taste is different, it's conveyed with honestly and sincerity. Don't look up wasn't funny, it wasn't productive, and it wasn't realistic portrayals of people in the slightest, and that combination entirely turned me off from the movie

But you can dismiss me as a bad troll and trot along with the rest of the sheep.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Reality has a liberal bias.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Good thing he doesn’t lead a low lying coastal state that would be heavily impacted by climate change and rising sea levels or this would be super awkward.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

His damage total won't be measured in dollars it'll be in meters and lives, if he's lucky there will be nobody left to remember his name.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i guess one plus side of climate change will be watching florida get completely fucked up

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it was exclusively filled with twatwaffles like DeSantis, I would agree. But there's a shitton of people that were born there, have nothing to do with the policies (if not actively voting against the people enacting them), and don't have the resources to up and leave.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we sign a bill scrubbing DeSantis from Florida law

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

From earth.

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

wow look another republican thinks he can retcon reality