Mobile homes could be a climate solution. So why don't they get more respect? (grist.org)

submitted 9 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/environment@beehaw.org

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Excerpt:

Newer models can also be a low-carbon solution as these prefabricated homes, which are built in large pieces for easy assembly, can include things like heat pumps and solar panels, in contrast to older models that relied on propane or natural gas. Older models can also be eligible for retrofits to make them more energy efficient and climate-friendly.

“They’re a pretty terrific solution,” said Rumbach. “Unfortunately, by law, in many places in the country [mobile homes] are not allowed to be placed anymore because there is such a cultural stigma.”

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, watch Last Week Tonight's expose' on the mobile home industry.

These homes are built to shitty, even dangerous, standards. Or no standards at all.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

Unless something has drastically changed recently, they literally use building scrap to make mobile homes.

I've worked on several of them, all of the construction is sub-par. Interior wall lumber is often shorter pieces, scabbed together.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Interestingly, John Oliver said nothing about construction standards, though I'd be surprised if it's not as huge an issue for mobile homes as it is for other recently constructed homes. The primary problem seems to be people not owning the land beneath their homes.

Obligatory fuck Frank Rolfe and the The Carlyle Group.

[-] RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago

Admittedly I was working from memory, I could swear that his piece had at least a short discussion of the low quality materials and workmanship of mobile homes.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

They tend to be built so poorly and have a shorter lifespan than a house.... Do we really need disposable housing on top of all the other stuff we make just to throw away? Harder to get a mortgage on them too (at least where I am)

[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 8 points 9 months ago

Frankly, the best climate solution is a multifamily dwelling with minimized external exposure and minimized grounds that actually require much special care. Large buildings you generally only need to cool and cycle fresh air, not heat. So any single family home is by definition resource intensive.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

I would rather live in a mobile home than another apartment. Shitty neighbors on 6 sides sucks.

[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And so would many people I think. It is not however low resource.

[-] b0rlax@beehaw.org 6 points 9 months ago

Classism mostly.

[-] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 3 points 9 months ago

They are death traps in a tornado or hurricane. You think a mobile home owner is going to have easy access to, or install a $5k tornado shelter? Yeah, no.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023

9 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3875 readers

36 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS