this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
2138 points (99.9% liked)

Work Reform

10006 readers
6 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BobbyBandwidth@lemmy.world 201 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you think the cops have tanks now

[–] TheDubz87@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was gonna say, we get shot for protesting now...probably gotta change that part first.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] TheDubz87@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I misspoke...er...typed, we get shot and have no real way to defend ourselves being wildly outgunned by police. Thanks for that PBS article btw. I hadn't heard of a lot of these happenings, and I'm still reading through it.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaGeek247@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now? The pinkertons never left, and they started ages ago. Protesters got shot then too.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago

Strikers were bombed back in the day by aircrafts. Unionization was won through enduring warfare yet we just gave it away. Shows how powerful unionization is that the elites are completely terrified of it, and that they have surpressed the history of it so few will know how much blood was shed to get it.

[–] IninewCrow@kbin.social 133 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“Governments don't want a population capable of critical thinking, they want obedient workers, people just smart enough to run the machines and just dumb enough to passively accept their situation.”
― George Carlin

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He was really wrong about voting though. If it didn't matter, the fascist GOP wouldn't be fighting so hard to prevent people from voting.

[–] flyoverstate@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Working from inside a system that has been corrupt from the beginning doesn't work

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Many parts of the system were designed to disenfranchise various groups. One of the most effective of those parts is the message that your vote doesn't matter.

Refuse to be disenfranchised. GO VOTE.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

And that they're all the same.

They're not.

Voting is like taking public transportation, it's not going to take you to your exact destination but you get on the bus that gets you closer.

Not getting on the bus because it doesn't go exactly where you want to, or you don't like the bus driver is allowing others to take you in the exact opposite direction.

[–] norbert@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Voting alone might not but it's an important part of the process. You should agitate and organize, but also go vote and get your friends to go with you.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Soap, ballot, ammo. Gotta go through the boxes in order.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He wasn't wrong. During this time the parties although different and Republicans being shitter, were much closer together. They were both pro corporate with differences on social issues.

Today.. The Republicans have gone full batshit trying to overthrow democracy. I guarantee you, if George was alive he'd be saying VOTE and vote for Democrats until we've gotten rid of the dangerous fascists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Signtist@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They're not the only ones who forgot. It's crazy how many people I know who shun the idea of any form of action beyond general protest in the face of corruption. I always ask them how they think change is going to happen when we have protest after protest and nothing to show for them, but they never have an answer. Things are going to get a lot worse before people realize we need to fight for our rights, and being angry on the internet - or even in person with a sign - is no longer enough to make a change.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

When violence is used to maintain the status quo, announcing up front that you're unwilling to use violence in response tells those in power that they need not listen to you.

[–] DrTautology@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sad thing is that we don't even need to use violence. We have the power to bring this country to a halt with nothing more than a well organized revolt.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just stay home and play board games for a week, don’t spend any money.

Things would change quick fast and in a hurry if a hundred million people all just took the end of July off.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not possible for a lot of people unless they're fine with starving. Additionally, prisoner's dilemma or some variant of that basically makes it impossible to do something like that, herding cats would be easier. World peace would be achieved if all soldiers refused to fight and yet that will never happen for a whole host of reasons.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That’s not possible for a lot of people unless they’re fine with starving.

This is why a network of support and organization during a protest is vital. Because you're going to have a lot of people in this position, so having some sort of place for donations and distribution of food/funds and a team to coordinate so the protests can continue uninterrupted is important. How to organize such a support network is a problem for people other than me who aren't introverts.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They got wise to that and called in the police and military to help them.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They did that back in the day too.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit.” over the bodies of tyrants

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, too unreliable - the worst of the lot hired private armies to assault and murder strikers.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Pinkertons literally became the FBI and CIA.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] cuacamole@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Hope you dont spoil those magic cards

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mayo@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I love this sentiment but I hope we can keep lemmy a nice place.

Like I'm sure we all agree that a good billionaire lynching would be awesome, but I also don't want to crow on about it day after day. Escalate or bust.

[–] islandofcaucasus@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Escalation takes build up. The French revolution was all murmurs and bitching until it wasn't

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not just build up, but actual conflict.

Revolutionaries aren't spontaneous creations. It takes decades of conflict between the population and the state to harden the people into what eventually becomes the revolutionary army.

Almost everybody here with their soft bodies and their soft minds is not capable of taking part in 6-48 months of revolutionary civil war tomorrow. You have to look at the conflicts of France over the last 10 years between its population and the state to understand what prolonged build up of radicals and radical forces looks like. Decades of a population actively doing battle with its state over various national things before ever reaching the point of "fuck it we ball".

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It feels that at this point, the ruling class has gotten so good at giving us just enough to keep us from outright revolution. It's little bonuses here and there, it's providing just enough to keep us afloat long enough to get through the next election, it's information manipulation to have us arguing with each other rather than focusing our anger on them.

It's going to be extremely difficult to break that control.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the endless money spent on propaganda, convincing people that companies are good and everyone fighting for workers' rights are evil, painting the latter as greedy and corrupt assholes with subversive intents

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like it’s the working class who forgot.

The rich are well aware, which is why they put so much energy into making us think that isn’t an option.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zombuey@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Look up why the christmas bonus became a thing.

[–] Krakatoa@lemmy.film 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just got a subscription to the jelly of the month club. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Here's your once-a-year appeasement sum. Don't spend all of that Bed Bath and Beyond coupon in one place."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

What gets me is:

If people have more money to spend, they buy more things.

The more things they buy, the more money goes into the pockets of corporations and the CEOs.

It's literally a win win situation that doesn't end in the Uber Rich being chased down by hungry angry mobs.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Redress." It's "redress of grievances," not "address." They can have similar meanings, but they aren't quite synonyms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RealThunderhop@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish we could back to that other option. It seems quite reasonable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's eerie how little opposition this kind of murder/violence fantasies get here

[–] islandofcaucasus@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

It took a lot of blood and violence to get to the point where we all think blood and violence isn't required in some situations. Millions and millions of people struggle every single day while the rich look for ways to take away their rights. It's literally human nature to want to fight back against that.

[–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

It isn't a fantasy, it's history. It is how our comfortable world was built, and if you think it is eerie then you should reevaluate how you feel about the benefits it has brought you.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

What do you suggest? Only the state can have monopoly on violence? Only the government which is controlled by rich people can use violence?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›