this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
753 points (93.5% liked)

Political Memes

5445 readers
3272 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redders@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Well...

For the equal partner bit they'd probably have had to respect election results and stop murdering political rivals.

And that would just be a step too far.

[–] query@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Barely. They were in the G8. Even after being kicked out trade kept going as normal, new pipelines were being built, nuclear power plants were being shut down because who needs a fallback?

Saudi Arabia gets full honors on the international stage, despite publicly executing people for criticizing the government or having independent thought, and cutting up a journalist in a consulate abroad.

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Blood money is still money!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not too sure about that. We're pals-y with plenty of authoritarian states. Even in the late 2000s and early 2010s we were so desperate to include Russia, corruption and authoritarianism and all, in the international order.

Above everything, you can get in good with the current international order simply by not making trouble for other countries. Russia, apparently, couldn't abide by even that minor restriction.

[–] solivine@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly if Russia didn't do a full scale invasion and just annexed the lands they were originally aiming for I think the west would have probably ignored it like all their other activities in the region.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

I suspect the irritation over the previous annexation of Crimea and Ukraine's increasingly pro-Western orientation would have led to a Western response even if the invasion wasn't full scale, but it's certainly not impossible that the West would've prioritized keeping things 'calm' over protecting Ukraine's sovereignty in such a scenario.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

desperate to include Russia

This is not historically accurate

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As long as they kept it to murdering political rivals within the country they would have been fine.

Everybody still does business with PRC, Saudi Arabia, etc

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Intralexical@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And that would just be a step too far.

Eh. Through the history of the 90s, it looked like they might have a shot at establishing a free and stable democracy.

Then privatization and mishandled foreign aid created their oligarchs, quality of life fell through the floor in basically all the post-Soviet states, people got mad, tired, and scared, Putin stepped in to "stabilize the situation"Then the politicians and journalists started dying, crazy siloviks and vatniks fully captured what was left of their political institutions I guess, and now they're doing a lot of evil murder and various interesting atrocities.

There might have been/probably were underlying cultural factors that made it impossible for Russia to ever stabilize as a "normal" country at that point. But those are hard to see from an outside perspective, and I guess they're probably pretty hard to see from inside as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I legitimately feel bad for the Russian people as a lot of them don't agree with what's going on and had to either leave the country to avoid getting jailed for protesting or are forced to suffer in silence.

[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i know few of them personally and generally those who live outside of Russia are against the regime and those who live inside Russia say they are not affected and are apolitical or that all countries to the west are controlled by US and want to steal Russian land + resources.

It's also funny to hear what they get to hear in tv aside from UK like that time they were told that in Europe it is so dry that people don't have water to drink or that people are freezing in winter because no RU gas

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

meanwhile in russian crimea, there is no water to drink and the gas line recently got blasted.

gonna be a shitty winter in crimea lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orrk@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

the majority of Russian people very strongly agree with the invasion, remember, Navalny might be the strongest opposition, but he was for even more radical reconquest of "Rightfully western Russian soil"

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I run a, let's say.. "Social Club" on discord (Okay it's an Erotic Roleplay server) one of our regulars is Russian, I actually worry about him quite a bit. He wishes he could leave the country, he's very lucid of the entire situation.

(Edit: I said he was 18+ instead of Russian because I get confused and word association happens. Of course he's 18+. It's an erp server literally everyone is.)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Sadly not a new story, most of the world considered Hitler a great man (He made the cover of Time Magazine) and had an "Aww shucks" attitude to most of the negatives what he did... then he started invading other countries, and even then the first one (Poland) got a shrug at first

"Not In My Backyard!" types have let all kinds of fuckery grow until it became their problem

[–] frezik@midwest.social 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's worth reading the actual Times article that they ran with that cover.

https://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,760539,00.html

Führer of the German people, Commander-in-Chief of the German Army, Navy & Air Force, Chancellor of the Third Reich, Herr Hitler reaped on that day at Munich the harvest of an audacious, defiant, ruthless foreign policy he had pursued for five and a half years. He had torn the Treaty of Versailles to shreds. He had rearmed Germany to the teeth— or as close to the teeth as he was able. He had stolen Austria before the eyes of a horrified and apparently impotent world.

It's not complimentary. Time's Man of the Year is based on influence. It's not saying that influence is good.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Same reason Trump was on it during his presidency iirc. Quoting them:

TIME has a long history of featuring presidents on the cover and Trump, whose presidency defied precedents and fractured norms, has been no exception. Eight of the top 10 people to appear most often on TIME’s cover are U.S. presidents.

Nixon, Reagan, and Bill Clinton have all been on more than Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eating Chinese pussy is also good.

[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's different topic mate. 😅

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fascism always winds up having to reach outside of its own borders.

[–] Ibex0@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spain kept it going internally for decades.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only because they didn't have a choice. The civil war destroyed their already mediocre industry and it was easier to just ally with the capitalists against the communists in exchange for financial aid.

Make no mistake, if it were possible for Franco to invade his neighbors he would have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

yeah what a paradise that turned into

[–] uis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Evil is uncontainable. If you accept bribe money, corruption will haunt your country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The implication here is that the west has a good relationship with Russia at some point, and that has never been true.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

There were a few years of hope of a genuine partnership after the wall fell. That hope remained but arguably became delusional once Putin took charge.

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Incorrect. "Good thing" =/= good relationship

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›