this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
160 points (83.1% liked)

Political Memes

5436 readers
3869 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
160
Political Subtext (midwest.social)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by archomrade@midwest.social to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 

edit: spelling

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

In case you ever wondered why those two positions are our only options:

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary?cycle=All&ind=Q05&recipdetail=S

They've bought out both parties long ago.

They give millions to our most powerful (and corrupt) politicians with no regard for party lines or anything else.

If you back Israel without question, line up and get your money

If you ever dont, they'll throw an insane amount of money to primary and general opponents.

Our system has been broken for a long time by "donations" we might not be able to to fix, but bare minimum we need to acknowledge it needs fixed.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think it's fair to point out the donation patterns of various superpacs, but we should probably also acknowledge that even independent of campaign finance the US stands to gain substantial benefit of maintaining military superiority in the ME.

Couching your understanding entirely inside finance rhetoric falls dangerously close to a conspiracy theory and should be cautioned.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but your line of thinking relies on politicians caring more about the country overall than themselves...

They care about defense spending, because they also get "donations" from weapons manufactures.

By no means did I mean they're only taking money from Israel, just that Israel's money comes with a single string:

Support Israel no matter what

Obviously they get money from more people

Like, did you see the name at number 2 between the Dem candidate for 2016 and the Dem candidate for 2020/2024?

It's the guy (also a dem) that had gold bars lining the suits in his closest.

They're taking the money, because they'll take money for almost anything.

That's not a conspiracy, corrupt politicians tend to care about money over everything else

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm just saying the alignment of the lobby funding and the broader american imperial interests is an important reason why this particular issue hasn't moved much in 80 years.

No disagreement that politicians are far too eager to take campaign contributions.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What would you say are the broad american imperial interests? Maintaining regional military control for the sake of oil -- thats the obvious one -- but anything else?

Genuine question here, I haven't thought or read much about it, whereas I have thought/read more about the incentives for politicians to continue pushing the ever bloating "defense" budget.

Edit: Here's not a bad article about it that I just read. Basically: the new cold war with china.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago

Most of the geopolitics of the region revolves around oil, that much is certainly true.

A lot of the rest of it flows downstream from that; oil pipelines and supply from various places and through the red sea, the relative military strength of adversaries in the region (derived from the wealth of their oil supplies), ect. Most of the modern geopolitical relations in the area can be tied to the struggle over oil in some way.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In my experience as an American, "fuck you pay me" is our only practiced and sacred value, and all our other supposed values are just empty feel good platitudes that allow us to play pretend our culture doesn't revolve around greed and greed worship.

Most Congresspeople got into politics explicitly to be bought, and working your way up in local/state elections is a process both major parties use to measure your ability to both be amenable to and effective at funneling that sweet, sweet bribe money into the party.

That's why the few that don't take Superpac money are usually spoiler candidates with economic policy positions both parties loathe, as yes, the economics of political bribery, especially since Reagan converted his former opposition that used to get bribed by unions to rake the bigger corporate bribe checks as Republicans always did creating today's neoliberals, greatly exceed any other force in American politics.

There's nothing ideological about petrochemical subsidies, for example, that industry can and does just write "donation" checks to our elected leaders, and their bribes trump our ballots every time.

I've no hope of this changing, and have accepted this greed rot is going to be our end sooner rather than later, and that greed is creating a swath of vectors, Climate change induced famines/droughts, AI, fascism rising to defend the mass ignorance required to support such thoughtless corporate greed in the face of all evidence, etc to do just that.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

but bare minimum we need to acknowledge it needs fixed.

I will never acknowledge the validity of that weird Pittsburg-ism where they omit the "to be"!

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I swear people give the south shit for the wrong reasons. Yes it’s racist, and sexist, and homophobic, and transphobic, and corrupt as hell, and WAY too serious about their imaginary friends, and I will happily admit all of those terrible flaws about my homeland and bear the shame of my ancestors for creating that world, but yinzers are the ones that talk weird and make up dumb words. At least y’all makes linguistic sense

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Rural areas in all states are all those things. The South is simply a few percentage points more rural than the East or West coasts.

If y'all visited us here in Atlanta, you'd realize we're just as cosmopolitan as anywhere else.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Wouldn’t need to visit I’m from just slightly OTP and lived ITP for 12 years, Atlanta is the exception as is Nashville, but I’ve lived in Hiram and Acworth too, my description is apt. You’re not wrong about the rural urban divide but I would also present you with Jackson, Memphis, August, and the fact that the governors mansion on West Paces in Buckhead is staffed by prisoners (you can probably guess what color skin the vast majority have) are evidence that while the whole country is racist in rural areas, it’s not even close to exclusive.

Don’t get me wrong, I love the south even though I don’t live there anymore, and deeply miss the parts that aren’t terrible especially the food and nights out on the Beltline. But the problems I listed in the previous comment, while existing everywhere in the rural US are baked into the deep south in ways that are different that other parts of the country.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I thought it was a British thing.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One of the problems is that yellow there isn't a single guy. There's a sunset that is actually just blue guy with a different name for sky-daddy.

The Israeli government is doing what Hamas wants the power to do. I wish fundamentalists of all types would just fuck off.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago

thanks, fixed it

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but what IS the yellow option? What does a "Free Palestine" look like if not Apartheid?

Please do recognize that, for whatever reason, valid or not, many these people want to kill each other. And it's not easy to identify which.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm just spitballing but secular democracies seem to work a bit better

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay. Good luck making them both secular. We can't even make the US secular.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 5 months ago

You're right. Lets shoot for a secular SOCIAL-democracy. I'd say let's go for a classless communist state but I just don't think that's realistic.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m just spitballing but secular democracies seem to work a bit better

Cool. What's the over-under on Hamas accepting a secular democracy?

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -3 points 5 months ago

probably not much better odds than Israel accepting one, but then again that didn't stop us from misguided statecraft in the past.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

BoTh SiDeS aRe ThE sAmE bEcAuSe ThInKiNG iS hArD