141

LGBTQ+ activists warn against normalizing Europe's far right (www.dw.com)

submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

LGBTQ+ activists share their stories with DW to warn against the potential consequences should nationalist and far-right parties make their expected gains in the European elections.

Monika Magashazi is a fighter. The 52-year old trans woman lives in Hungary — a country that has been ruled by Viktor Orban's nationalist Fidesz party since 2010.

For transgender communities, the situation "has been becoming worse and worse and, unfortunately, we are desperate today in Hungary," she told DW. She said the government was trying to portray trans people as pedophiles and criminals, using seemingly every opportunity to discriminate against them.

Struggling with her own coming out, Magashazi even attempted to take her own life. "I reached a point when I had to decide on how to live on," she said. Thinking about her children saved her life.

"I said I will keep myself alive and try to live as a transgender woman and the father of my children — or the second attempt will be successful, and I'm going to be dead. And in that case, my children would miss their father," she said.

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

It’s so incredibly fucked up to read about Orban’s shit. Here’s hoping the EU elections don’t go as poorly as some are projecting

[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile the German "center" and "center left" are actively doing everything to push more far right extremism. Following their racist tropes, spreading lies about immigrants. Increasing police violence and general authoritarianism. Employing austerity measures throwing entire city-districts into poverty while wanting to cut the income tax for the highest tax brackets and refusing to implement a wealth tax.

DW as the government run foreign media of Germany is incredibly rich to deflect from their normalizing fascism in Germany by pointing at other countries. This is not to defend Hungary or Italy. It is to clear up about the motives and actors here, which is a political class in Germany once again enabling fascism instead of fighting it, using minorities for virtue signaling, while actively bringing on their demise.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

According to the Hungarian government, the legislation was meant to end legal uncertainty but did not "affect men's and women's right to freely experience and exercise their identities as they wish."

But human rights groups have criticized the law, saying it puts trans people at risk of harassment and discrimination because they are forced to reveal their transgender identity every time they need to present their driver's license or passport.

The same-sex couple, who live in Italy, told DW they are one of more than 30 families who had the birth certificate of their child contested.

This happened last year after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government ordered local authorities to stop registering children of same-sex parents with both of their names.

"Our message is really: She is that bad, and you can never trust her words," said Santamaria, arguing that Meloni has mastered the strategy of telling people what they want to hear and lying about her true intentions.

Staszewski told DW how he and his fellow activists faced targeted attacks from politicians, media and courts under the previous nationalist-conservative government in Poland, how they felt like "second-class citizens."

The original article contains 923 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The phrase father specifically denotes a man. A transgender woman should be referring to herself as a mother; shouldn't they? So she is no longer a father to her children, but rather a mother, right?

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

I think it's important to note that this is all very personal to the individual. There is no "should" and a transgender woman may still consider themselves a father.

Just because we may not understand it, doesn't mean it's wrong. Which is the important lesson for much of what is wrong in the world right now.

[-] Happytongue@lemm.ee -1 points 4 weeks ago

It is exactly the fact people can’t understand it that it’s wrong. If you can’t understand something, at the very least it leads to people using it in a way that is wrong if not immediately then in the bigger picture. A mother cannot be a father, and a father cannot be a mother. Reality doesn’t work like that. What will that do to the child’s sense of truth. People certainly don’t want others to make them accept a mental delusion as normal. It isn’t. There is no hate involved, it’s simply reality. To say that violence is inevitable is just another way of attempting to force one’s mental issues upon others. To justify it. This will all be seen as some weird phase in humanity’s decline.

[+] kitnaht@lemmy.world -14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, because for others to understand it, it must follow some sort of logic.

If people all have different rules for what offends them, then those willing to learn, can never hope to ever achieve understanding. If you can never allow others to achieve understanding, then you're always going to be a victim and acceptance will never be achieved.

If you can't deadname a transgender woman their male name, then it goes to follow that they wouldn't consider themselves a "father" and doing so would cause the same offense.

[-] Weslee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I don't understand the feeling of being a different gender than what I was assigned at birth, and I don't need to - I can accept that others may have those feelings just fine.

Why do you think others need to force themselves to fit your understanding? Why do you need to understand them to respect them?

Answer is - you don't.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world -2 points 4 weeks ago

I don't need to understand individuals to respect them, but I do feel the need to understand people as a whole.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

“Transgender people are individuals that you can just talk to if you aren’t sure how they prefer to be referred to” shouldn’t be a scarier way to live than memorizing a rule book of The Correct Way to be transgender and interact with transgender people, as though we are a monolith.

Not all trans people prescribe to a binary view of gender in general or their own gender. Some people are women who are fathers or men who are mothers. They don’t have to justify themselves or the nuances of their identity to be accepted, because understanding isn’t necessary for acceptance. I accept shit I don’t understand all the time, like sportsball fans or Funko Pop collecting.

Acceptance isn’t “I am always interacted with in The Correct Way”, it’s “I am given a basic level of respect and listened to”.

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, as others have said here. My point was you don't need to understand why. You just need to understand that it's what makes that person feel complete and not pigeon hole them with everybody else.

Who's to say that the person that labels as a woman and a father is being offended? By assuming this person will be offended you're labelling their personal feelings of who they are in to a stereotype.

My interpretation of your comment suggests it sounds like you're worried about offending. I think the best position is to be okay with the idea that you're going to offend some people sometimes. If you do, you apologize and explain that you didn't realise that what you were saying may be interpreted that way, and move on. If they want to push it further than that, then they're being difficult (just because somebody is in a minority, doesn't mean they're "right"). Everyone needs to realise that we're not actually all out to get one another, and just let these little misunderstandings go.

Story time.

A good example of this, in a different setting, is that I was at a BBQ a few weeks ago. A guy I know, somewhere between acquaintance and friend, said I can drink his beers from his cooler because mine were in the fridge inaide. As I drank more, I totally took advantage of this (inhibitions lowered and all that) and drank a load of his beers. The week after when I saw him again I said "sorry man, I think I drank all your beers last week". He said "no worries. All good". And we moved on.

We do stuff that offends others all the time, and others do it to us. We just need to apologise when we realise and move on.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024

141 points (92.7% liked)

World News

37383 readers

3032 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

quinten@lemmy.world

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world