17
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jdeath@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago

anyone who supports trump was never a libertarian

[-] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Oliver ... had clashed with candidates from the Mises Caucus faction when he defended free and open immigration during the presidential debate."

"Following his nomination, Oliver was attacked online by Mises Caucus members for ... his view that parents and not the state should decide whether puberty blockers can be prescribed to minors, and because Oliver, who is openly gay, has appeared at pride events holding a rainbow flag."

The libertarian candidate gets attacked by other libertarians for wanting open immigration, trans rights, and for being gay.

Why do these libertarians only want personal freedom for straight white folks?

I wonder where all these "libertarians" stand on women's rights...

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, Kremlintarians and LINOs have been trying to infiltrate the party for years

[-] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Libertarians had been split on abortion for years, if that helps clear it up at all.

[-] Buelldozer 1 points 2 weeks ago

The Mises Caucus are not libertarians, they are Trumpicans in VERY thin mask.

[-] HANN@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Don't worry about the "libertarians" that oppose Chase. I imagine after this defeat the false libertarians will rejoin the MAGA crowd. The convention made it clear that the majority of the party still has good values and principals. Focus on that. Chase won the nomination. The others can either join or move on.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago

Libertarian, to me, breaks down to "Hooray for me, and fuck you."

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

No, it's hooray for me. Who the fuck are you?

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
17 points (90.5% liked)

libertarianism

356 readers
13 users here now

About us

An open, user owned community for the general disscussion of the libertarian philosophy.

Most people live their own lives by that code of ethics. Libertarians believe that that code should be applied consistently, even to the actions of governments, which should be restricted to protecting people from violations of their rights. Governments should not use their powers to censor speech, conscript the young, prohibit voluntary exchanges, steal or “redistribute” property, or interfere in the lives of individuals who are otherwise minding their own business.

Source: https://www.libertarianism.org/essays/what-is-libertarianism

Rules

1. Stay on topicWe are a libertarian community. There are no restrictions regarding different stances on the political spectrum, but all posts should be related to the philosophy of libertarianism.

2. Be polite to others and respects each others opinions.Be polite to others and respects each others opinions. We don't want any form of gatekeeping or circlejerk culture here.

3. Stay constructive and informationalIn general, all types of contributions are allowed, but the relevance to this community must always be evident and presented openly by the contributor. Posts that do not meet these requirements will be removed after a public warning. Also remember to cite you sources!

4. Use self-moderation measures first before reporting.This community is fundamentally built upon freedom of speech. Since everyone understands libertarianism differently and we do not want to exclude any kind of content a priori, we appeal to the individual users to block/mute posts or users who do not meet their requirements. Please bear this in mind when filing a report

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS