294

At the start of the video, Lauren Windsor of The Undercurrent presents herself as a true believer who showed up at a Catholic Prayer for Trump event seeking a photo op with Stone. From there, Windsor starts asking Stone for his thoughts about the coming presidential election.

While Stone said it was too early to tell who will win, and while he stated that President Joe Biden can’t win in 2024, he added that the election “can be stolen again.”

Highlighting “overconfidence” as “one of giant problems right now among our own people,” Stone said “we’re working on it,” it being the prevention of a repeat of 2020.

Link to video

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 127 points 1 week ago

Stolen again? I'm so tired of this shit. They're gonna do it again no matter the results. How is the FBI not all over these people? Its the same coup rheotirc.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Yep, it's infuriating, but the FBI has a bunch of Trump loyalists, so it makes sense why they've had their thumbs up their asses regarding these chucklefucks.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I guarantee the Proud Boys are going to be harassing the polls. We're going to have to muster a fucken militia just to be able to vote.

[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

We are his soul marching on

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago

Just to be clear, shitfuck Stone isn’t admitting to stealing an election or trying to steal an election, he’s implying that President Biden stole the election.

He goes on to say “We’re working on it: lawyers, judges, technology,”, so he’s definitely admitting to trying to steal this upcoming election.

So yes, same coup rhetoric, and I would like nothing more to see his front door ravaged by a battering ram during an early morning no-knock warrant raid, but you are taking that one specific quote regarding an election being stolen again slightly out of context. Everything else you said is totally valid based on everything else Stone said on camera though.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's almost like they let him out of jail just for this kind of garbage. But who, pray tell, would have done such a thing?

PS - if you think it's Roger's first spin, go watch Unprecedented. Bear in mind, this is likely to make you a tad unhinged.

[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Cannon is a

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

One of the funniest Twitter moments was when the FBI arrested Roger Stone and [American football player] Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson teeeted, “FBI arrested my neighbor Roger before my morning jog, I've only seen shit like that in movies, crazy to start to my Friday.”

I think more people learned about it from people sharing that Tweet than from any news organization.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That's hilarious but sad at the same time.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
294 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18069 readers
3980 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS