this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
251 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 22 points 4 months ago

Omg Biden is genociding those poor poor oil executive's profit margins!

From the river to the sea, oil exec profits will be drastically elevated!

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ThEy ArE tHe SaMe UnIpArTy!!!!1 bOtH sIdEs!!! fOr moThEr RoSsIa!!1 sIrI dElEtE lAsT sEnTeNcE

Cums into own mouth

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

This is the highest discourse centrists are capable of.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but Biden has bad debating skills, so we're all going to vote for Trump now so he can overturn this, right?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

The debate has had a remarkably slight impact on public opinion to date. It's not clear that it'll shift things in any kind of meaningful way.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Biden administration denied permission on Friday for an Alaska agency to build a 211-mile industrial road that would have cut through Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve to reach copper and zinc deposits beneath untouched wilderness.

The pair of decisions from the Interior Department is part of a steady stream of environmental moves that President Biden has taken ahead of the November election to solidify his standing among conservationists, an important constituency.

In blocking the road, known as the Ambler Access Project, the administration prioritized conservation and protections for tribal communities that depend on hunting and fishing in the area over mineral development that might enable more clean energy.

Ambler Metals accused the Biden administration of rejecting the road based “not on the project, but national politics in an election year.” The company said it would “explore all legal, legislative and regulatory avenues to move it forward.”

The two-lane, all-season gravel road would have run through the Brooks Range foothills and the Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve, crossing 11 rivers and thousands of streams before it reached the site of a future mine.

Senator Dan Sullivan, Republican of Alaska, said last week he had added an amendment to an annual defense bill that would force the Interior Department to select a path for the project.


The original article contains 844 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

If Amber Metals didn't want Biden to reject the road project in an election year they should have withdrawn the proposal. But they only care about themselves so sucks to suck.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The Alaskan wilderness is going to be "The Great Valley (Land before time)" to post apocalypse survivors