531
Tier list (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] leekleak@lemmy.world 64 points 9 months ago

Is walking better than biking? As I understand biking's more efficient.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It depends. Expended energy/m is higher but space usage is much lower. For walking you arguably don't even need a paved path while (non-sport) cycling needs a somewhat even surface and places to store and lock the bike. It's not nearly as bad as with cars but even with cycling, space usage can become an issue in very densely populated areas; the Dutch don't build massive bike garages because it's cool (okay, maybe also a little of that) but because it's a necessity.

If it's near enough to walk, it's usually better to just walk.

[-] ntzm@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago

More people are happy to walk than bike, and getting hit by a bike is worse than getting walked into by another person

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

I guess it is because of the tires

[-] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 9 months ago

I feel like the amount of wear I put on my shoes by walking a certain distance is higher than the wear on my tires when I bike that same distance

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is it though? Time for science, it's the only way to tell for sure!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] woobie@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Save mother Gaia, go barefoot as goddess intended.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Walking is better because if you can walk it means stuff is close to you.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 53 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Bikes are actually greener than walking, because if you need to move, they allow you to have a greater daily range for a not much higher footprint (more efficient and 3 times faster).

[-] tomi000@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago
[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Embedded CO2 for a bike is like 100kg (that's what 4 trees in your backyard absorb a year), which over a lifetime of 30 years is negligible.

[-] tomi000@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

You say negligible, but what you mean is negligible on a scale of the CO2 emissions we are used to. Human body CO2 emission is just as negligible on that scale.

Ill do some quick maths: According to the first source on google, an average human burns 3kcal/min walking and 5kcal/min biking at 15km/h, which is about 3x as fast as walking. Considering that, we arrive at a difference of 1.33kcal/min by walking instead of biking. Estimates suggest 1.3g CO2-equivalents per kcal for average consumption (much lower for vegans), so thats 1.73g CO2/min. 100kg CO2 for bike production would take 57,800min of walking, thats almost 963h. An average bike will probably be used more so I guess you are right and bikes are indeed more efficient than walking :D

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

CO2 emissions that fall within natural cycles in terms of scale, are negligible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Adori@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It's faster to make bikes than legs

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

It's also really green if you die riding one in places where it's completely unsafe to ride one like where I live. You eliminate your carbon footprint completely!

[-] knotthatone@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I was so excited to finally live in a city where I could actually ride a bike to work most of the year until I actually tried it.

Drivers are assholes, have no awareness of their surroundings, the rules of the road and they give zero shits.

Nope nope nope. I'll walk to the train

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 4 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] calavera@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I can say the same about public transportation

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 27 points 9 months ago

But tanks are the perfect cure for traffic jam.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

That's clearly self propelled artillery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] i_am_a_cardboard_box@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is c level a motorcycle or an e-bike? I've never seen an icon for an e-bike before, and if it is, I am loving the conciseness of the design. If not, there's no way a motorcycle is better than a line bus right?

Just a bonus note from a Dutch guy, the text just below say lekker blijven likken, or: 'just keep on licking'.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago

It's probably ebikes, mopeds and motorbikes.
I'm sure there could be an entire tier list for 2 wheeled vehicles!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

tankies in shambles

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

The missing S tier is a sedan chair being carried by 4 shirtless stud muffins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Yeah let’s send Ukraine bikes

[-] Puschkul@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago

I unironically want to see bicycle infantry back. Would also be a nice thing to have for the individual soldier, as time in the open is far more dangerous than being hidden or in a fortified position.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gigan@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

This makes cars look to good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

But tank driving is a lot of fun.

[-] MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

How is a moped better than a tram?

Edit: I mean for the environment, I'm sure mopeds are better than trams in other ways - like for doing tricks and making quick runs to the supermarket to get bread and milk

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gerula@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Where do the plague of SUVs and light trucks live in this scale?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] atticus88th@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Driving a tank to hell is probably a good idea.

[-] HerbalGamer@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

let's push those yachts and private jets down a few levels while we're at it.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Where do monster trucks lie on this scale?

Actually, serious question: How do most of you feel about car sports? Like if we managed to get a world where cars are not a necessity would vehicular sporting events also be purged? I'm not much of a race fan, but demolition derby and monster truck shows are fun.

[-] nei7jc@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

The community is, I believe, about eliminating car dependency. Basically, it would be an ideal world if you don't even have to consider owning a car to participate in society. Car racing is like the difference between mountain biking and riding a bike around for your commute. There are worse practices than racing cars.

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Nah dude, care can be really cool toys! I fully support Nascar, demolition derbys, monster trush shows, old car collecting, etc.

I just don't want cars to be the main way to go places, let alone the only one as it is in many places! It is bad economically, it is bad for people's health, and it is bad for the environment. Using cars for entertainment though really isn't an issue, nor is using them in situations where the alternatives don't work as well.

[-] space@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

The pollution impact is fairly small and a lot of innovation happens in those competitions that might end up in ordinary vehicles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Transcriptionist@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Image Transcription:

A sticker attached to a pole with a QR code in the top right corner. Down the left side are the letters A to G on coloured tags with arrow-angled right ends, and under G a black coloured tag with HELL written on it, in the style of the European Union's energy efficiency labels found on appliances. Each tag ranges in colour from dark green to red and increases in size the further down it goes. Each arrow end indicates a different silhouette.

The A tag is dark green and very short, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of a walking stick figure.

The B tag is a slightly lighter green than A and slightly longer, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of a bicycle.

The C tag is light green and slightly longer than B, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of an moped.

The D tag is yellow and slightly longer than C, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of a subway train.

The E tag is orange and slightly longer than D, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of a car.

The F tag is orange-red and slightly longer than E, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of a yacht.

The G tag is red and the length increase from F is almost triple that of previous length increases, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of an airplane.

The HELL tag is black and longer than G, the arrow end points towards the silhouette of a tank.

[I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

[-] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So some errors:

  • the C tag points to a silhouette of a moped, not an e-bike.
  • the D tag points to the silhouette of a subway train, not a bus. You can tell by the wheel sets.
  • most egregiously, the F tag points to the silhouette of a yacht

EDIT: As pointed out in one comment, it's the F tag pointing to a yacht, not the G tag. I corrected the post.

EDIT2: Our transcriber has updated their post to reflect the changes. Well done good person! 👍

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

i saw e-bike with C. I think one could see either

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
531 points (92.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

8607 readers
527 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS