this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
48 points (77.3% liked)

politics

18933 readers
3148 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 96 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not really

Conservative 'protesters' get treated with kid gloves, or pardoned by the governor of Texas. They usually don't get charged. They have friends in the forces.

Progressive protestors get maced, shot, beat to shit, locked up, maybe charged but probably not since they are more frequently non violent, and then they maybe get a settlement.

E.g., how will this help those protesting cop city? The cops are already ignoring the law.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People love to cheer on the defense of the worst protestors and promotors of violence because "it ensures the rights for everyone" seems to miss the part where it is only used to ensure the rights of the the worst people.

No, the ACLU defensing nazis doesn't benefit everyone when protestors for peace in Palestine are violently assaulted by the police.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The ACLU defends civil liberties for everyone and is an overall force for good. Nazis have the right to say nazi shit here. Them being morally repugnant wastes of space has little to do with their right to free speech. The government cannot limit protected speech and that's a good thing.

Also the ACLU has nothing to do with corrupt cops being violent pigs. Actually, they fight to end qualified immunity for those very people:

https://www.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/ending-qualified-immunity-once-and-for-all-is-the-next-step-in-holding-police-accountable

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nazis have the right to say nazi shit here.

Nobody has the right to call for genocide.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Maybe not. That could qualify as inciting "imminent lawless action." perhaps?

This is obviously not a moral judgement on my part, just the law

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The assumption here being that courts do nothing ever and that the justice system doesn’t exist.

Seems ignorant and reductive but I’m not an expert

[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The courts absolutely do something. My point is that most of the damage is done before it reaches the court.

Cops don't arrest cops or people on their team. But when they do, prosecutors don't charge cops. Cops do arrest nonviolent protestors. Prosecutors do charge nonviolent protestors. Later those charges are dropped, or they're set free with an agreement not to sue the department, or occasionally there's a settlement, that taxes pay for.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago

Thank you for elaborating. It makes your point much more clear.

I want to abolish prison, then police, personally.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The courts are unreliable due to corruption, and we do not have a functioning justice system.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying you haven't been paying attention. Must be nice to be so privileged you don't have to worry about it.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago

You sound like a very pleasant person who is focused on their own self improvement. Long road ahead?

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Some of those that work forces

Are the same that burn crosses

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago