this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
152 points (99.4% liked)

politics

18695 readers
3696 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

I saw this article earlier.

Regardless of politics (not sure it fits) and it's subject matter (gut wrenching) it's just incredibly well written.

Maybe not the best reading before bed, but definitely deserves the 10-15 minutes to read it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup. The stuff that's coming out is scary for anyone who was in Combat Arms for a long time. The thing is, you can look at the different sections of the military and see immediately where the brain damage occurs. Anyone adjacent to combat arms could have told you this decades ago. I didn't mean that negatively. It's apparent in the difference in culture, prevailing attitudes, and the soldiers around them continuously being quoted with stuff like, "there's something crazy about those guys."

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bro it's not just combat...

This is 100% engineers too.

Like, if it was just symptoms I'd write it off as coincidence. But the method of damage they go into...

It 100% is getting people outside of combat, if someone was having to wear hearing protection in their work space constantly, they were likely getting this damage, and it's not showing up on brain scans or anywhere else.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah Absolutely. I don't know about heavy equipment operators. Like, I literally don't know enough about what they do. But the sappers and route clearance teams that worked with us are exposed just as much. And training is as much of a problem as actual combat.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah. I was an engine room, the entire time we were out to sea and working, it was insanely loud in addition to like 130F temps and damn close to 100% humidity.

We knew it was bad for us, but no one thought about brain damage.

But like, we had an E8 who had been in engine rooms forever. At the time we joked about him being old but he was early 40s max.

Dude exhibited all the signs in the article, and so did anyone else who had a couple tours already.

We just called it "salty" and choked it up to putting up with the Navy for so long.

But with what this article is talking about...

It's just low grade brain damage, which fucking makes way too much sense now.

Like how the old stereotype of football players being dumb and violent. With what we know now about CTE, those stereotypes are just making fun of brain damaged kids. This isn't CTE, but it's still brain damage that's invisible on scans.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Guy specifically aimed for the heart so that his brain could be preserved for research, which worked.