210

cross-posted from: https://derp.foo/post/250090

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 98 points 9 months ago

Why do I need an account for a light bulb?

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 131 points 9 months ago

Because a skin sack with an MBA needs their yearly bonus.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

First time buying an IoT device I take it?

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 55 points 9 months ago

If it’s proprietary, it’ll be enshittified as soon as shareholder value demands.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Can we stop the overuse and over-generalization of "enshitification" which Doctorow had given very explicit meaning to in regards to social networks? It does not simply mean commoditization which is not quite the same but almost synonymous with 'race to the bottom's in regards of trying to increase revenue while simultaneously decreasing costs.

Edit: I'll admit narrowing to "social networks" is a bit too narrow, but the point still stands that it's for two way platforms where there are "two markets." Phillips Hue does not have a two sided market.

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

The enshitification of enshitification

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

There is still value in calling out the exploitation. It might not be as shitty as leveraging different customer pools, but it absolutely is the same exact business mindset that creates enshittification.

I don't think it's wrong to at least associate the two things even if "enshittification" remains more about gearing systems to exploit customers vs basic direct exploitation of customers.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

But their entirely different processes. One is exploiting one market vs the other. Here it wouldn't necessarily be exploiting a market, but destroying value of a free service. If you're worried about personal info being the exploitation, it's going to be very limited and likely already in place. An account structure is usually more the first move toward monetizing the service directly and enabling the ability between free and premium services. That's still shitty, but for entirely different reasons. So I just don't like seeing the original word lose all meaning whatsoever beyond its root word. It basically guts it of all of its nuance and importance and just turns it into a noun form of taking something and making it shitty. We don't need to do that.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't think they're entirely different. Enshittification is just a specific type. Yes, of course it has distinguishing qualities or we'd be having a totally different convo.

IMO, it's more important to realize enshittification is not a new development! It's just way, WAY more obvious now that the ruling class has allowed effective monopolies to rise again. When only one or two companies control an entire market, their shitty tactics become way, way more obvious and painful for consumers.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

The general driving force is different though. It's a process that involves devaluing a service by basically commoditizing two forces against each other. Simply dropping value-added features to save money is just the race to the bottom.

Dropping a feature is the equivalent of charging for extra BBQ sauce packets. It's not the same driving force like Instagram where they play two forces against each other. Like the way Google has been going with shoving way too many ads in there. That is a different motivation because it's valuing one customer at the expense of another. Something like dropping free service XYZ is just cutting costs.

The word is getting overplayed and it feels like everyone has the same word-a-day calendar and are now trying to use it as much as possible.

It's more impactful and retains meaning if we keep it succinct instead of just the equivalent of "an unpopular decision that saves money to increase shareholder value". It's all about recognizing you are a product as well as a user. It's that the services don't have an incentive to serve you. Its just so much more meaningful as long as we don't remove all of that meaning to just show we don't like corporatism.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] WhyIDie@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

to add to this for people that are unsure, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification

[-] okamiueru@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nah. He called it that, but the word follows grammatical* structure well enough that it can be easily understood and used in a more general sense. "the gradual increase in which something is shit" = "enshitification".

Fits for what he wanted to use it for. Fits for a whole lot more. One cannot gatekeep language. Whatever is the most effective way to transfer a concept from one mind as to be similarly understood in someone else's, ultimately is language.

* maybe not grammar, but you get what I mean

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Words change. He came up with a really good one and people ran with it. It no longer means what he initially made it to mean. That's how all language in all of the world works.

[-] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago

You're saying that if someone wants to descibe enshittification they need to invent a word for it?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Lol next step it will demand your WiFi password to always be online, because why not.

The step afterward you ll have 5 "room light subscription options, offering different service for high demanding customers"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JCreazy@midwest.social 14 points 9 months ago

I don't even know why people still use Hue anymore. It's overpriced and zigbee and matter exist.

[-] dan@upvote.au 17 points 9 months ago

Hue uses Zigbee though, doesn't it? In my experience they're the most reliable Zigbee lights with the most consistent light output, and work very well as routers.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I bought 8 hue bulbs for $12 each like 6 years ago and every one of those suckers still work to this day. And the bridge came with the bundle. I just looked up a replacement bulb and its $20 per bulb. If those still last as long as my originals I will happily keep using them. They have worked flawlessly on my homekit schedule and they turn off at 1am and turn on at dusk every day without fail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crow@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Can someone recommend some good alternative zigbee bulbs? I started using sengled but it seems they stopped making zigbee bulbs so they could work closer with Amazon and their ecosystem…

[-] maxprime@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

I’ve been using ikea bulbs since I started with home automation and have had no issues. Some I connect directly to my Zigbee receiver and others I connect to the dirigera hub which home assistant sees through HomeKit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 3 points 9 months ago

I replaced my light switches with ZigBee light switches and just use ordinary light bulbs instead. Obviously no dimming or changing color possible, but that's what the nightlights and led strips are for.

[-] mrfriki@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

It sucks. Any other compatible app, free or paid, that let you set routines like alarm clocks and that worth it?

[-] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 9 months ago

Probably home assistant? Thats what I use.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

(this is the homeassistant community)

[-] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 9 months ago

Whoops. In this case I don’t understand the question.

[-] Chup@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

The old Hue app still works and I'm also using Hue Essentials, both without any account.

I have a Hue bridge of the 1st generation and a few years ago, the original app was showing pop-ups, that I need to get a new bridge because of the new app that will no longer support my old bridge. So I just kept the old app and the old bridge. Works like a charm all offline.

When I added a motion detector two years ago, the old app didn't find it for setup. That's when I tested the alternative app Hue Essentials and it works just fine offline.

[-] Osiris@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Get a zigbee dongle and add the bulbs to HA directly. For a sunrise alarm I use this Blueprint

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Good that I didn't buy, then.

[-] TimeWalker@lemmy.foxden.party 12 points 9 months ago

Since the Hue bulbs are using the Zigbee standard, you can still safely buy them in the foreseeable future and just connect it with something like SkyConnect, zzh!, Conbee, etc. and use it with Home Assistant

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago

I was under the impression that the v2 Hue Zigbee was encrypted, and hadn't yet been broken.
Is this still the case?

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

Are phillips things reflashable with esphome/tasmota? I'm not a huge fan of tuya, but so fari have been able to reflash/rebrain everything i gave bought from them. It should be a lot easier though :/

[-] llii@feddit.de 22 points 9 months ago

There is no need to reflash them. Thy're zigbee, you can just connect them to a different hub or to a zigbee dongle.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Wait, all of them? Noice.

Though I do have one that’s running a “candle” hue labs program, I wonder if I can replicate that outside the Hue environment.

[-] llii@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

The special features are hard to replicate. Hue sync won't work for example. That's why I still use the hue hub in addition to a zigbee stick for non-hue lights and switches. But if they want a login I'd rather drop hue sync and just add the lamps to my zigbee stick.

[-] vodka@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Not all Philips bulbs actually, only Hue. They have another line called Wiz which uses wifi.

[-] Jakor@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I looked this up a while back. Someone wrote code to try to replicate it in homeassistant on their forums. If I recall correctly, it didn’t work quite as well as the hue version but I haven’t have a chance/reason to try it yet. Maybe someday soon.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
210 points (98.6% liked)

homeassistant

11421 readers
20 users here now

Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Available for free at home-assistant.io

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS