this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
776 points (92.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2673 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A horde of trailer-park visigoths can sack the Capitol and Republicans say "what's the big deal?" But let one guy show up in casual clothes and they lose their goddamn minds.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think there is some value in dressing nice and decorum. The same way we dress nice for family dinner or wear business casual to work even though there might be no dress code, it shows respect. That being said, if anyone is outraged at this then they completely lost the track. We're long way past the point of caring about "decorum" in the senate. Dressing nice is like that nice little cherry on top of the sundae, it does not fucking matter if the sundae is made of literal shit.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same way we dress nice for family dinner

You and I have entirely different families.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wear business casual to work even though there might be no dress code

You are a very strange person

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Like I said, it's ridiculous for them to cry crocodile tears over a guy in a hoodie when they wave away the fact that the whole building was sacked by a horde of magats. If there was any sign at all that they respected any of our country's institutions, then they could possibly be taken seriously on this. (But not likely.)

You dress nice for family dinner? They're lucky if I have pants

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Asifall@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He should wear a tie over a vee neck just to fuck with them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I just think it's interesting that the previous dress code was so much more restrictive for men than for women.

Men had one and only one choice: a suit and tie.

Women could wear suits (also called "pantsuits" for some odd reason -- why not call the alternative a "skirtsuit?"), they could wear dresses with short or long sleeves, they could wear skirts, just not miniskirts. The jacket was optional, although many women wore one. They could wear flat shoes or high heels.

In terms of colours, men had to wear dark colours. Women could wear red, maroon, checked patterns, the variations were huge. They could wear ties, but they didn't have to. Many wore necklaces instead, often with an open-necked shirt. Can you imagine a man being allowed to wear an open-necked shirt, no tie and chains?

I just hate suits and ties. I think they look stupid, and hate that that look is associated with "business wear" for men. If the Senate does go back to having a dress code, men should have as many options as women for a "professional" look that doesn't include suits. (And yes, open necked shirts with chains should be part of that.)

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I don't care about the stroke. Run for president bruh.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I love it. Hah hah hah

I bet you Biden is just itching to get into his normal attire: a cut-off Van Halen t-shirt, skin-tight jeans to show off the hog leg, and an Italian horn necklace.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd love to see him and Fetterman roll into Sheetz late at night in Biden's Stingray blasting Journey

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Republicans prefer those in the Senate chamber to wear fur and horns.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mf looks like a circus strongman with that tash. Not even sure they make suits that size.

load more comments (4 replies)

Not pictured: Mitt Romney choking on his milk.

[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

He needs to stop skipping leg day!

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

Decorum rules are so fucking unhelpful. Its shocking how un-American our reps. are. We need more Fettermans.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

He presides OVER most everybody!

[–] TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this is fine. I understand why rules of formality exist, but it's not like Congress shows decorum in its actions. If they want us to respect it, they should pass good policy that helps people, we care much more about that than whether individual senators wear a suit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] S_204@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Shoulda showed up in a tan suit and blown their damned minds.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›