this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
160 points (98.8% liked)

HistoryPorn

4578 readers
108 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raef@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They look like historical reenactors

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Seems like today's reenactors are doing a good job then :D

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If they're not, they were in for a nasty surprise the first time they charged into a position with machine guns.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago

This is a year before the start of WW1, so that's likely precisely what happened. The start of the great war completely changed tactics and overall military doctrine. At the beginning, officers would often command cavalry charges against machine gun fire, with expected results

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

some of them may have in WW1

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Then it was a good point

[–] luciddaemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its odd to think this is how it was prior to machine guns and tanks. Color really does make it feel like a reenactment.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

this is how it was prior to machine guns and tanks

Unless OP typo'd the year in the title and this wasn't actually from 1913, Gatling guns had existed for almost half a century and the British Mark I tank was only 3 years away.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, machine guns existed, but Europeans had pretty much only pointed them at Africans until one year after this picture was taken.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

They were used in the Franco-Prussian war a bit.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Whatever happens, we have got

The Maxim gun, and they have not!"

[WW1 starts]

[screaming internally and externally]

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Should be 1813, it's Napoléon's army

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, Europe had spent most of the time the Gatling and Maxim had existed for fighting under the rules of engagement, as the great British Captain Blackadder once noted, that the "prerequisite of a... campaign was that the enemy should under no circumstances carry guns."

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

"Right, Baldrick. This is an old trick I picked up in the Sudan..."

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

That's really high quality for literal potato photography.

(Context: The autochrome used starch particles from potatoes - some dyed red, others green, others blue - over the photosensitive layer on a glass photography plate as a color mask that was used both for filtering incoming light as the photo was taken, and for producing appropriate colors when viewing. The images needed to be shown backlit at high intensity, and neither color reproduction nor sharpness was very good. Starch was cheaper than three times as much photosensitive material, though.)

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If men's formal wear looked like this I'd get dressed up more often

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Be the trendsetter you want to see in the world o7

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah but where am I gonna find a chest plate in my size?

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

What building is in the back right?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I don’t believe it. Those are totally modern trees.