206

Microsoft - keep your filthy hands off Valve, leak shows MSFT would buy Valve (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 9 months ago by boo@lemmy.one to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] theragu40@lemmy.world 78 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Valve is a private company. Microsoft can't just buy Valve, Valve would have to agree to that. Considering Valve has (for a company their size) effectively unlimited resources already, and considering that Valve's founder and leader is a known detractor of Microsoft, this is a nothing story. Microsoft will not buy Valve. This is baseless musing, like how I sometimes daydream with my wife about what we'd do if we won the lottery (which we don't play).

Of course Microsoft would love to buy Valve. Just like they would love to buy Nintendo. I'd like to buy a Lamborghini. All these things are about equivalently likely, zero likely.

[-] ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Gabe Newell will die one day and with him the age of gaming shall die as well.

Any other owner would sell out to the billions of amazon and microsoft.

[-] theragu40@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

We can only hope that there are people waiting in the wings at Valve who are ready to take over the reins whenever Gaben is done and carry the torch forward in the same direction.

[-] notepass@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

I am pretty sure that already happened. Any bigger (or even many smaller) companies have disaster recovery plans if one of the higher ups dies or vanishes. There is a high likelihood that the next valve leader is already fixed or at least a Gremium to get to there.

[-] theragu40@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I agree

[-] danileonis@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

They could open the code even more, that day real free gaming and Steam Machines will be a real thing.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 14 points 9 months ago

Even if they were public, they would have to lose majority share of the company to lose control over whether msft can buy them.

But yeah, no shit they'd like to buy valve. Valve is positioned to eat their lunch in the gaming space.

[-] guitarx@metalhead.club 3 points 9 months ago

@theragu40 @boo I'd rather buy Valve than a Lamborghini. Just saying. 😆

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 77 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

*Valve laughs in Gabe Newell, owner of Valve and former employee of Microsoft.

Motherfucker left Microsoft to focus on games. He spearheaded the move to Linux to protect their store from becoming blocked on Windows. He knows how Microsoft works, intimately.

I’d be really surprised if Valve got sold to Microsoft while Newell still lives.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 36 points 9 months ago

We must protect this man at all costs.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately, we can't protect him from weight related heart issues :/

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 21 points 9 months ago

Fat jokes aren't funny.

Except this one, and only because we've all been there.

[-] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 9 points 9 months ago

He's 60 years old. He'll probably be around in good health for another 10 years.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

I sure hope so. But at his weight, people can start having heart problems fairly early. Then again it seems he's lost some in recent years, so maybe he'll get to see old age.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

HOW DARE YOU?

[-] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 9 months ago

got sold to Microsoft while Newell still lives.

Surely you mean while he's "Still Alive", right?

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

This was s Triumph

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

This was s Triumph

Also GLaDOS: "Managing to misspell a word that is only a single letter definitely is some kind of triumph."

[-] vardogor@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 33 points 9 months ago

They know that gaming is the one thing that often keeps people from switching to Linux. Buying up all these gaming companies is their strategy to keep gamers locked into Windows.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 20 points 9 months ago

They know that gaming is the one thing that often keeps people from switching to Linux.

They know this because they keep purposefully making Windows worse and less consumer-friendly. They want you to use Windows how they want you to use it, in a way that maximizes profit for Microsoft.

[+] Eheran@lemmy.world -11 points 9 months ago

How is windows getting worse?

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Refusal to let the user decide how they want to use the system. Examples such as:

If I uninstall Skype or Candy Crush, I expect them to stay uninstalled. Nope. Each update, Microsoft says "Nope, you need these" and re-installs them.
Pushing Microsoft Accounts hard. For most consumers, the copy of Windows 11 they'll get won't even allow them to use a local account. If they're savvy enough, they might be able to look up the PowerShell commands to bypass it, but it's pretty much a done deal for most average people: if you want to use consumer Windows, you're looking at needing to submit to using a Microsoft account for logging in.
Ads ads ads everywhere! I don't ever remember Microsoft being this pushy before. It won't shut the fuck up about Microsoft Edge. Hell, I had to put up with fucking Cortana on every install until very recently when they finally decided to drop her useless ass.

They have in general decided to say "fuck what the consumer wants, they'll use our OS how we say."

[-] BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

And then there's the administration. It's like they hired a billion Indians to make a billion random admin centre interfaces with random functions and random names that change once a year and make no sense. With 10+ years of enterprise windows administration behind me I suddenly have to look up guides on how to do basic things because they keep moving everything around to nonsensical places (probably so they can sell the newest certifications).

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Good points. Non of them affect me personally or the family where I do support, but still. Maybe I don't see that as most are still on W10.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

That's fair. I don't know why you got downvoted for asking a reasonable question. Not everybody deals with these issues front and center.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

For me, it has essentially only gotten better, which is why I wondered what is getting so bad. With 10 or 11 I hardly have to help people with things. But yeah, privacy etc. is clearly getting worse.

[-] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 3 points 9 months ago

@dingus @Eheran this sounds terrible. What are you going to do?

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Continue to use Linux as my primary go-to for operating system except in cases where I am in need of a Windows machine.

Then, when it comes to Windows, continue being informed about the inner workings of the OS and using Powershell and other tricks to get around the worst of Microsoft excesses.

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

I deleted Skype and candy crush once, years ago and its never showed up on my system since then and I forgot cortana even existed not long after it was introduced. How is your experience so much worse than mine?

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago

It continues to lack real mandatory access control, for starters. You can deny system apps permissions and Windows update will just quietly revert them. It has a hidden "user" which cannot be restricted.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That would be not getting better - not getting worse.

[-] olicvb@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

ads, start menu becoming tied to internet searches ultimately slowing it down, performance decrease win11 vs win10, Bloatware, Xbox locking game folders, the new context menu.. these are the ones i can quickly come up with

Update to add: The goddamn shortcuts, can't just click and drag from desktop to start menu or taskbar, and vice versa anymore

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

Perhaps that's part of it. But I'd say the bigger part is just wanting more control over the tech industry in general - gaming and OS are just part of that.

[-] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

@irmoz @const_void we as gamers need to unite and not have to feel like we need to participate in this manner. We can create things we like on engines and systems of our choice. We make it worse by indulging in individualistic behavior of not standing by our fellow gamer.

[-] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 points 9 months ago

@irmoz @const_void systems ***

[-] trollblox_@lemmy.ml 31 points 9 months ago

wtf they just had trouble buying Activision/Blizzard and now they wanna buy Valve. they would ruin valve

[-] ampersandrew@kbin.social 31 points 9 months ago

No, three years ago they contemplated buying Nintendo or Valve. Activision happened because those two didn't.

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

Gotta obfuscate the fact that this is years old information to maximize the rage clicks.

[-] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago

There's no fucking way Japan would let go of Nintendo.

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

The money machine hungers for more. Never satisfied for more than a moment.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

ohh hell no..... I am done with microshit

[-] kugmo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

If MS did buy Valve would gamers finally rise up?

[-] SitD@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

gamers rise down 😂

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

What would "rising up" mean? So far, gamers have never shown a rebellious bone in their metaphorical (yet still emaciated) body. Every action by the gaming community has always been defined by corporations. Even gaming on linux is only viable because of valve.

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I would just stop buying games. I'll only play old games and open source games, if Steam gets enshitificaties.

[-] prunerye@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago

Long live GOG.

[-] boo@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

imo its not big/useful enough to matter. if it did, MS would have wanted to buy it as well :)

[-] Prione@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

If only they would support Linux / Proton officially even minimally...

[-] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 points 9 months ago

@Prione @prunerye Itch.io is what you may like.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023

206 points (93.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

14815 readers

251 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.