this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
49 points (94.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40728 readers
378 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to share a self-hosted tool I developed. It's a NUT monitoring tool similar to webNUT but it has some additional features like:

  • UPS command support to remotely tell your UPS beeper to shut up.
  • Supports some uncommon and old devices like ARMv6, ARMv7 and RISC-V64.
  • It's actually light-weight, ~7MiB image size and very low memory footprint.

If anyone looking a tool like this, repo is available at https://github.com/SuperioOne/nut_webgui

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Looks great! I'll have to give it a try

[–] SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Thanks! I appreciate any kind of feedback.

[–] rjc@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biggest difference is being able to execute INSTCMD commands, at least that was the main reason why I developed my own tool. Another less important differences are: older ARM support and since it's written in Rust, it's much more efficient in terms of resource usage. TBH, being that efficient only makes sense for very low-power devices.

Besides that, I don't think you can go wrong with either project.

[–] rjc@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the reply, sounds compelling. I'm running peanut currently and have been happy with it, but I might power out down and give this a spin. Low resource usage sounds like a nice selling point.

Thanks for your contribution!