this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
342 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive Link from archive.today

Original link from The Wall Street Journal

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buhala@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What the fuck? You're already paying out the ass to get food delivered why are they shoving ads in your face?

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But what are you going to do about it, go pick up food yourself like some plebeian?

We should all be thankful that our Uber Eats Chipotle burrito only costs $57. These ads should help maintain these ultra low food prices.

[–] madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

Simple: money.

[–] BlueDiamond@rammy.site 10 points 1 year ago

And they rip off their drivers too. 😑

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm so fucking tired of advertisements. I'm sick and tired of it.

[–] eu@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

That's basically why I am here. I can't go back to Reddit's official app and its ads after using Boost and Joey for years.

[–] GIMC@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

This, I feel monetized. I dont like that feeling and it's the one of the reasons i've stopped using reddit

[–] 2deck@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed.. Augmented reality is going to be a nightmare hahah

There are ways around adds; alternative apps, addblockers, roms and privacy focused browsers. The only mandatory adds are on street corners imo

If adblockers didn't work, I'd be living alone in the woods somewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cavemeat@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Me too, I've basically left all traditional social media because of it.

[–] Pekka@feddit.nl 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apps that autoplay video adds really don't respect people on mobile metered connections. Especially if these videos are 90 seconds long. This is such a greedy addition to an app where you are already paying for a product...

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ya, I hope this means my ride is free.

[–] DpwnShift@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

HAhahahahahaha, that's a good one!

[–] GilbertGarfield@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The over-commercialization of everyday life we see in the Cyberpunk genre is finally becoming real. Now where’s my flying car?

[–] Isildun@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

At least let me get some cybernetic enhancements off the street or something...

[–] zakomo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

69,666 ads away to enter the raffle. Start watching.

[–] Supermariofan67@lemmy.fmhy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why the fuck are ads even profitable? Seriously? Who actually sees an ad and thinks "I'm going to buy this product"? When I see an ad I think "fuck you" and I'm less likely to buy their product.

[–] dan@upvote.au 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You'd be surprised. Advertisers wouldn't be running the ads if they didn't have positive ROI (return on investment). A good ROI is usually at least 5x (that is, for every dollar the advertiser spends on ads, they make five dollars). Google's estimates are even higher at 8x:

we conservatively estimate that for every $1 a business spends on Google Ads, they receive $8 in profit through Google Search and Ads.

(source: https://economicimpact.google/methodology/)

Retargeting ads - the ones where you view a product somewhere then see ads for it on Google, Facebook, etc - are especially successful. They have a very good clickthrough rate since the product is already something the user expressed interest in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WillOfTheWest@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re paying for a portion of your attention. They’re slowly building an association with their product such that when you finally get around to buying say a VPN subscription your first thought is “Nord.”

It’s not going to affect everyone the same, for instance my thoughts on VPNs are “anything but Nord”; but they only need a fraction of users to develop a positive association with their brand.

[–] TheBurlapBandit@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nord's cheap and keeps my ISP off my ass for torrenting. That's all I need.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkWasp@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

They’re everywhere to the point where I wish I had an adblocker built into my eyeballs. Watching NHL there’s ads on the ice, the jerseys, the helmets, popping in from the sides, overlaying the score etc. it’s so out of control and that’s just one thing.

Either it’s a giant pyramid scheme that keeps getting money funnelled into it or if this shit really just works. The sheer amount of money spent on it is absurd, sometimes as much as the budget of some movies to promote said movies.

[–] grant@toast.ooo 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BioHall@lemmy.pt 5 points 1 year ago
[–] jsqribe@feedly.j-cloud.uk 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No worries we will just uninstall them all same way we did Netflix.

Imagine federated Uber/Eats 😂

[–] Osayidan@social.vmdk.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Call it Federeats

[–] rekkar@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

non-paywalled link: https://archive.is/foKCB

The reason simply seems to be a: "Well, what are you gonna do? We want to squeeze every cent out of you"

[–] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

What am I gonna do? Simple. Just stop using your services. You either respect your customer or you don't. There are plenty of alternatives.

[–] ed2417@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

This should be good for Lyft.

[–] kherge@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I’ll be happy if they go through with this. I already have trouble resisting the lure of easy access food, but this will help me kick that habit.

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I don’t use any services with ads. None. This will be the end of me using Uber.

[–] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Video ads will run on the primary Uber app while users wait for their drivers to arrive and during their trips, said Mark Grether, vice president and general manager of Uber Technologies’ advertising division. They will also appear on tablets installed inside certain Uber cars.

The Uber Eats app will play video ads after customers place orders and continue until their deliveries arrive; Drizly will run them in search results on its app and website as well as other areas of the site.

Why do they think anyone will leave the app open after ordering, if it just plays ads nonstop? Is the idea that each time they load it to check their order status an ad starts playing?

Audio for ads on the company’s apps will be muted by default, while users will need to manually turn off the audio and display components of the in-ride tablets, according to Grether. Ad inventory will initially be sold directly to buyers in the form of brand takeover packages, with only one company’s ads running during any single ride or transaction.

In-car tablets with audio-enabled ads for a single company on repeat. Poor poor drivers.

I bet the first thing a driver will say once a patron gets in is "you can click this button right here to disable the ad (please please please)"

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, so there's ads playing in the car, but the driver doesn't get any extra revenue as a result? Why would the drivers even allow that? If I were a driver and was forced to install those tablets, I'd probably just unsolder the speaker.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Invader753@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Uber and lyft both work on web mobile. Still a good reason to not use uber though.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you aren't paying you are the product...Wait...Aren't we paying?

[–] Plume@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Yes but... what if we could make more money?

[–] borlax@lemmy.borlax.com 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’m still too broken up about Google Readers untimely death.

But really, I have been using more RSS feeds lately too. The only issue I have been having recently is that a lot of the websites that offer RSS don’t push the whole article to my feed and I still have to go to their website so they can serve me their ads.

I think the ad driven revenue streams are what is gonna keep us from seeing a major RSS resurgence.

[–] Senseibu@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

have you tried the RSS feeds from Lemmy yet? I havent I was just wondering

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MisterMoo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

They can't show you ads if you don't have their app installed.

[–] minorsecond@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am so sick of ads being everywhere. It's such a mental load.

[–] milkytoast@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

same. fortunately with all the apps I use, I havnt seen an ad anywhere in ages, not on youtube, ig, web, anywhere

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I genuinely believe ads are a form of pollution. The pollution they spread is psychological but it’s pollution nonetheless, ads exist to make us feel bad about something enough to make a purchase and why shouldn’t things that exist to make us feel bad be removed from our environment?

Absolutely. It's loud, bright, disruptive and disrespectful. And it can make some things and places less accessible. In the last 5-7 years it's really gone out of control. We need serious regulations.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are they expecting people to pay for the service, AND watch ads?

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 1 year ago

It's worked for cable TV (and some streaming services) for a long time. I guess other companies want in on it too. Strange to see Uber doing it though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

with 0 uber apps on my phone I will see exaclty 0 ads :)

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Hahahahahahahahaha.

People begged city hall to allow Uber to operate here. Begged. I wonder how they're going to play apologetics for this now.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

wow this is bullshit

[–] swnt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Uber is learning from social media apps

[–] anji@lemmy.anji.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Huh. Guess I won't be using Uber's apps then. Anytime I'm a paying customer I do not want to see ads shoved in my face. Good thing there's competition.

[–] BeHereNow@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Nice. Never liked Uber, another reason to avoid it.

load more comments
view more: next ›