this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
762 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2654 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That's only like a half million each...

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Taxes won’t fixe this, but an 18th century invention might.

As long as the rich have the means of wealth generation they will always come ahead no matter how much you tax them. They will always buy back the system. Now if those means were somehow communalized then things could change once and for all.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 0 points 1 month ago

Le capitalisme

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This is a completely meaningless figure...

I really hate when articles come out with this kind of data. Huge numbers like this without any context just mean nothing. Ok, 42 trillion$, how much money did they already have? How much percent did their fortunes increase? Is that more or less than inflation?

It's just a meaningless huge number that has no intention other than to shock, certainly not to inform or they would have given actually useful numbers that would actually let you have an idea whether it's that bad or not...

I hate that people keep falling for nonsens like this.... Just post a huge number without any context or any other numbers needed to be able to make sense of it, and everyone is like "omfgwtfbbq, this is SOOOO bad"! Is it? It's perfectly possible that this isn't even enough to keep up with inflation, and they're technically poorer, probably not, but we'll never know from this useless article...

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round and see the spectacular boot-swallowing man!

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, i can't critisize such stupid articles without opposing their message... I'd love more equality, and agree that something should be done about it.

I just would love to see actually useful numbers that mean something when we make a fuss about it rather than useless info like this that is meaningless.

How you interpreted my message as bootlicking is beyond me, but i guess you're a youngling that interprets any critique as an attack?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›