this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
682 points (97.2% liked)

Leftism

2096 readers
214 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (2 children)

She is based and so fucking true. We were lied to and we need to do something about it.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

she's great. I was a medium player in the Weird Twitter scene and she found it and loved it.

William Gibson followed me because Mara retweeted some dumb weird Twitter "joke" of mine

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Coooooooool

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jlou@mastodon.social 36 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Socialism vs capitalism is a false dichotomy. There are other alternatives like economic democracy or mutualism where all companies are democratic worker coops. There are other critics of capitalism besides Marx such as the classical laborists like Proudhon and their modern intellectual descendants like David Ellerman

@leftism

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Economic democracy is just an aspect of a healthy socialist society.

Mutualism is a type of socialism.

The false dichotomy is between Leninism and liberalism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The false dichotomy is between Leninism and liberalism.

Wait, are you implying these are the same thing?

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

A dichotomy is where there are only two choices or extremes. By saying it's a false dichotomy you are pointing out there are other options. It doesn't necessarily mean the two options from before are the same.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

By saying it’s a false dichotomy you are pointing out there are other options.

Ah, was a bit confused, because I've never seen anyone doubt the alternatives of Fascism or Anarchism.

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mutualism is not socialism as it has been defined in the 20th century @leftism

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  1. Proudhon referred to himself as a socialist.
  2. Revolutionary Catalonia, the Makhnovshina, and the MAREZ all existed in the 20th century. All of them had mutualist elements and called themselves socialist. The successors to the MAREZ, the CGALs, still exist and still consider themselves socialist.
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

or mutualism where all companies are democratic worker coops

I think that Karl Marx might have described that as the workers controlling the means of production. In fact I think he had a word for that...

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 1 points 3 months ago

Marx wouldn't have described an economy that uses markets as socialist

@leftism

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Real Capitalism Has Simply Never Been Tried

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

That's what they keep telling me, but every step closer to free market capitalism we take seems to make things worse.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm very confused and I'm sure it's because I'm very ignorant of modern pop culture, but who is Matilda?

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117008/

The protagonist of a book that got adapted into a movie almost 30 years ago

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank you. I read the book when I was a kid, but I was 18 or 19 when that movie came out, so I'm not surprised I didn't realize she was the actress in it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

She looks older in the picture too

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The fact that no one would ask this about Radcliffe/Harry Potter is exactly why this tweet of hers is hilarious

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Faceless Old Woman Who Secretly Lives In Your Home is right.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wait, Matilda voices the Faceless Old Woman?? TIL

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

She does, yes.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Communism is not socialism

[–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Communism is a form of socialism. If you think socialism is a single ideology, then you've only read the spark notes for either.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, communism is what anarchists think they will get

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

The Trumpshbull

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Again, it boils down to "define socialism".

Are we talking about USSR, Cuba and China-type socialism? Then they are all those things.

But if we're talking about Finland, Denmark Sweden and Norway-socialism, then I'm on board with socialism!

[–] coldy@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that none of the countries you listed were ever socialist. Finland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway are just capitalist countries with good social policies.

And as much as their propagandists wish they did, the USSR, Cuba and China never got past the state capitalism part of establishing socialism.

There has never really been a socialist country in the world, it's a bit of a moot point to go like "I like this kind of socialism but not this kind" when nobody ever got to see it...

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's my point. Socialism developed a broad meaning as time went on. Before, it started to mean simply demanding better worker's rights and conditions. But evolved to mean businesses owned by workers. Eventually, communism came into the scene and started to promote stateless society run by the proletariat. Then with so many people being turned off by the violence of communism, the more moderate left-- social democrats-- advocated to implement socialism through political and electoral mobilisation. But even then, as time progressed, social democrats abandoned their attempts to implement wholesale socialism and instead rein capitalism with sweeping regulations, instead of abolishing capitalism. Nonetheless, even though social democracy still embraced capitalism, the ideology is still considered under the wide tent of socialism but further right to it.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

IIRC communism was the original Das Kapital version, and socialism came into being as "communism-lite" not really following Marx's ideal but giving some good things to workers

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The term socialism was first coined in 1832, way before Das Kapital has been published in 1866. But before Karl Marx, socialism as we know it wasn't something that is fully solid despite the term already being coined. During 1848 liberal revolution, there were some who participated who'd be considered "socialists", but they don't necessarily know what they want.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

That's really cool! Thanks for the context I hadn't known about that broader current of socialist thinking

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Define the Nordic Model. It’s not socialism what they have. At best it’s a social democracy. They still run on a capitalistic system. Not to mention they are crawling to the right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 9 points 3 months ago

Using socialist to mean "has social policies" is weird to me (and some of the Nordics aren't in a great state government-wise right now)

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

None of those are socialism.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's literally Venezuela