this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
246 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
246
Vance’s History Of Extremist Remarks On Family Doesn’t Stop At ‘Childless Cat Ladies’ (talkingpointsmemo.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Vance isn't just weird; he's creepy:

  • Vance REALLY seems to hate women without children.
  • Vance wants parents with more kids to get more votes.
  • Vance suggested women should stay in violent marriages for the sake of their kids.
  • Vance sees some government proposals to expand child care as “class war.”
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

He said children should get votes, and parents should control those votes. My ears perked up at that word "control". I think it shows how he thinks about control, he wants control, etc. It's always projection.

*He also said "ruling class". We don't have rulers, we have representatives. Nor should it be a class, it should be the people. I think he wants rulers and classes. I think he tells on himself.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

We have a ruling class. It's called capitalism, and the wealthiest 0.1% of corporations and families (a Venn diagram between the two is probably a circle) — your level of representation is proportional to your wealth.

What conservatives want is to remove the veil of pseudo democracies we live under, and return to a direct feudalism with the Christian fascists ruling everyone. Most of them (e.g. Vance) aren't even true believers in this cause; they're just useful idiots/narcissists scamming the masses for their extra sliver of pie.

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He's got the vibe of a guy who once lost a pull-up contest and had his ego severely damaged over it. So he went home and trained on nothing but pull-ups for years until he got really good at them. And now he goes around challenging everyone to pull-up contests, insists that pull-ups are the superior form of exercise, crashes school board meetings demanding that kids be required to do a certain number of pull-ups in order to graduate, and advocates for this bizarre idea of tying voting rights to how many pull-ups you can do.

Like, we get it. You like pull-ups. A lot. You think they're important. But not everybody does, and certainly not enough to serve as a basis for voting rights.

He should be happy we don't have political power tied to some other person's stupid niche hobby. Like owning real estate.

[–] numberfour002@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have many concerns about these types of comments and statements that are disparaging towards people without children. It really seems like it's an attempt to paint whole swaths of the population (but particularly targeting young voters and the LGBT+ folks) as unworthy to vote and morally contempt. Super weird and shady.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Agreed. On top of his creepiness....we have 8 billion people on the globe and that's simply not sustainable. Americans are among the biggest consumers, too. We don't want a rapid population decline, but a downward population trend is a good thing.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Couchfuckersayswhat?

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For someone obsessed with other people's reproductive choices, ol' JD seems really confused on how it all works.

[–] MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I’ve had it up to here with people saying JD Vance had sex with a couch. How many times do I have to say there’s no evidence JD Vance had sex with a couch before people stop saying JD Vance had sex with a couch? Liberals must be pretty desperate to make up that JD Vance had sex with a couch. The story that on March 17, 2011 JD Vance was banned from a Cleveland area IKEA after so thoroughly deflowering a KIVIK Sofa Chaise that it had to be removed as a biohazard due to the various fluids in and around it, causing the night manager to not only quit but need intensive therapy is beyond the pale. Who would believe this? There is sworn. court. testimony. that JD Vance has not made bare skin contact with a couch within the past 5 years. That’s a fact. Look it up. The idea that this is because JD Vance cannot contain his overwhelming sexual urges in the presence of soft furniture is reckless conjecture. Calling JD Vance a couchfucker is slander and you need to take it back.

The Left™ will do anything to avoid talking about the real issues in this campaign, like the fact that Kamala Harris laughs sometimes.

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What?

[–] Drusas@kbin.run -1 points 3 months ago

Woosh

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“We’ve allowed ourselves to be dominated by childless sociopaths – they’re invested in NOTHING because they’re not invested in this country’s children."

I like how he's admitting that he himself was "a childless sociopath" before he managed to impregnate someone. Shame for the rest of us that he managed it at all.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Hi!👋 me again, don’t forget to:

Print photos of different couches or dolphins and mail them to any or all of these locations:

https://www.vance.senate.gov/office-locations/

Don’t forget to add little love notes. e.g., “Thinking of you 💋”

And, remember kids, drink your Ovaltine!

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Talking Points Memo Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Talking Points Memo is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/talking-points-memo/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Good bot