this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
465 points (96.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9720 readers
224 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 182 points 3 months ago (23 children)

Well yeah. Who gives a fuck about a 2% increase in the GDP? Prices are high and wages are low.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Housing (homes and apartments) is either in yet another bubble, or I guess just going to permanently remain absurdly high, slowly filtering more and more people into homelessness and death.

EDIT: (derp i fucked it up, EDIT 2)

Average rent vs median wage, cpi adjusted, and indexed to 1982 = 100.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1raP7

(Basic take away: the average real rent is about 4.2x or 420% what it was in 1982 whereas the median real wage has only risen by about 1.2x or 20%)

Edit 3: I would do median rent vs median wage, but FRED does not appear to track median rent.

Personal debt levels are astoundingly bad EDIT: If you do not own a house. The average US renter credit score is 638, and most places won't even consider you if it is below 620.

https://www.investopedia.com/do-you-need-credit-to-rent-apartment-8600564

... a study from Rent Cafe found that the average credit score of renters in the U.S. was 638 in 2020 (the most recent data available),...

The medical system remains ruinously expensive and corrupt.

The proportion of those who are not counted as unemployed, but who are not working, ~~climbs higher and higher.~~ is lowering, but still has not recovered to Pre-Covid levels, much less abated its general downward trend since the 90s.

(Labor Force Participation Rate).

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1raRG

College costs climb further and further, offering less and less likelihood of an actual decent paying job.

Wealth inequality is the worst in the known economic history of the world.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 101 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's going well for anyone making capital gains. It sucks for anyone else earning a fucking wage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, corporations are doing great, the "economy" is a good indication of that, but it means fuck all for us.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm ready for progressive Roosevelt-types and I'm voting as hard as I can to get them. I'll take Teddy, I'll take FDR, I'll take Eleanor.

I just want someone scrappy enough to succeed on our behalf.

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I just want things to hurry up and get to the stage where rich investors start jumping from windows again because even the stock market can't hide shit anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago (1 children)

because it doesnt matter how great the economy is, because only the rich and businesses benefit from it.

Meanwhile us peasant folk are still struggling to buy overpriced essentials and afford the worst, most unsuitable, barely qualifying roofs over our heads.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mmm I love sawdust in my food! /s

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 14 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Woah there, slow down money bags. Around this economic level we pad our food with high fructose corn syrup, pink slime and sand for flavor.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago

It's almost like the word has a different meaning on Wall Street than it does for the average person!

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 3 months ago

“Economic growth” = rich people’s yacht money

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It doesn't matter that the economy is growing if it isn't lifting up your life as well. Hundreds of millions of people still live in US states where it's legal to pay $7 an hour. (2/3 of them) All of us are dealing with rampant inflation and crippling costs for utilities, housing, and food.

The government's position on this is that the Biden Administration has created 16,000,000 jobs, and while that may be true, I'd wager my savings that most of those are second and third jobs, because it's become impossible to live with just one in the United States of America.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd wager my savings

Well if you're like most sub 35yr olds, that's not a big wager at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago (7 children)

We think the economy is worse because it is for us. Food prices have doubled or more than doubled in the last ten years and our income is stagnant so we make the same but everything costs more. We don't see any growth or stability in the quality of our lives.

Inflation is nothing compared to price gouging and price fixing by businesses that no one tries to curtail. This is approved of by the powers that be.

But let one opportunistic asshole corner the market on hand sanitizer in one region of the US at the beginning of a pandemic and he has to give it all away because nearly everyone thinks he is a monster.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 9 points 3 months ago

Inflation is nothing compared to price gouging and price fixing by businesses that no one tries to curtail.

Lina Khan is on the case and making waves.

She's the single most hated person in the C-Suite across the USA.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 3 months ago

No, no, the economy goes very well to the bourgeois elite that controls the state.The workers who are getting worse and worse.

Communism-15592290

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 38 points 3 months ago

Maybe if the average citizen would benefit from economic growth.

[–] bobthened@feddit.uk 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because the measures that economists use to measure the economy are not relevant to regular people. GDP tells you nothing about living standards.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Only getting better for the ultra wealthy. That's what the system is for and it's working better than it ever has.

If you think about. When capitalism is less capitalist is when regular people benefit. (Regulation, healthcare, free education)

Socialist American policies were the best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 34 points 3 months ago

"Economic growth" = stock market up

Stock market is just the scoreboard for theft of economic value, it is useless as a measure of economic health except maybe inversely (if stock market is up that means more wealth is being extracted and funneled upward)

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That "economic growth" is for the benefit of capital owners at the expense of everyone and everything else. I'm so done with capitalism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yep. Just reading the title, the "economy" is up, and people are worse for it.

The fact is, despite record breaking profit, nearly none of that "growth" is being provided to the people creating the value for companies to sell, and is instead being handed upwards to people with more money than brains, who have "invested" in the business.

The lines on the stock market graphs go up, and the people working for that company who create all the things that are generating the profit, are robbed, and their would-be wages are handed to the shareholders.

Is anyone shocked by this? Is anyone surprised by this?

Did anyone not know this already?

What a stupid article.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The economy grows, but the benefit is not reaching the proles

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 3 months ago

Stock market gains or shareholder gains mean absolutely shit to the average american.

If I can't afford housing and bread, shit isn't good. Let's change how we report on the economy.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 months ago

We've known the ownership class was treated differently after the bank bailouts in 2008 which ran entirely contrary to capitalist theory as it was taught: if your company fails, then your company fails, and its detritus will feed growth elsewhere.

But it turns out some companies are special and are too big to fail because when they go, dozens of other propped up companies collapse with them.

I can't help but wonder if we let that catastrophe happen, would it serve as a reminder why capitalism needs to be strictly regulated? Because we undid all the regulations erected thanks to the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007, and private equity is still demolishing huge chunks of the economy while investors get rich on bankruptcy shenanigans. This is the same kind of aristocratic bullshit as 1789.

We had a peaceful protest. OWS. Then one night, NYC turned off all the cameras and unpeacefully swept it away. We were told they didn't have specific demands. But they did, and their grievance was legit regardless.

So now, society is stratified. The ownership class has segregated itself from the working class and they won't consider grievances from the third estate. We saw during the Obama administration a _recovering economy _is not felt by the working class. We see now they're glad to install a one-party autocracy to keep it that way.

To be fair this was always the endgame. Our industrialst betters were sore over the New Deal. And later, school integration and interracial marriage.

I think their plan is to literally arm robotic dogs with guns and try to to rule us at gunpoint, kinda like Hebron. See XKCD 1968.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's the "economy" and then there's the real economy. The one that affects the 1% and the one that affects the 99%.

The 1% love the current "economy".

The 99% hate the current economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow.

It's almost like pathologically fetishized "growth" (perpetually fetishized by the rich and their trained sycophants in the media, that is) is completely disconnected from the socio-economic condition of the majority of people on this planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Economic growth doesn't necessarily translate to an economy that serves the needs of a wider majority, often it means just the opposite.

[–] InternetUser2012 23 points 3 months ago

I see prices going down, here and there. It's good but it's also bullshit. They raised the prices to make record profits and when people can no longer afford anything, they drop them. "See how nice we are, we lowered our prices for you", when in reality they're scared because people gave up buying their shit altogether.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 3 months ago

Where was all that growth? Could it be in the pockets of billionaires and the owners of this country? Cause I don't hear regular people cheering about the extra money they suddenly got from their jobs.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 months ago

...then it is.

Check your instruments.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ok let me preface this by saying every single person experiencing homelessness deserves the security of a roof over their head and more.

<150,000 is surprisingly low to me.

Is this nationwide? The upward trend is concerning no doubt, clearly something is wrong is more people are experiencing chronic homelessness at a rapidly rising rate. But honest to god I am shocked to see it isn’t at least 1-2mill nationwide.

Edit: thinking about it now 1 in 300 would be pretty high

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It is a notoriously hard metric to track

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

The secret ingredient is corporate greed.

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Well, an economy that prices more and more people out of specific markets (like, the average person can't afford the median home any more and the cost of necessities like food, fuel, clothing and housing has gone up much faster than return on labor) might involve a rising stock market but it is objectively worse if you make your money by working.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I dare you to post a wage gap chart. Who gives a fuck if the "country" is growing financially, if like 60 billionaires take more of it??

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BodePlotHole@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Homes aren't going to get more affordable... Neither is Healthcare.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 17 points 3 months ago

The economy IS getting worse.
VIX yesterday let me know that economists think we're about to enter a recession.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago

The other 30% are rich

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

"Believe"

Looks like you should instead be focusing on how these 70% draw the conclusions that lead to their "beliefs"

[–] palarith@aussie.zone 11 points 3 months ago

All economic numbers are bullshit

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It's too uneven. Personally our household is doing better because both kids are working and the company I work for ditched plans to go public, and a couple of other factors. But:

Car insurance increased sharply (probably counted as money coming into the economy)

Homeowners insurance increased

Food prices increased.

Wages don't increase as much as household costs. Until the wages of everyday people are growing faster than their expenses, they aren't doing better. Again, personally we are, but I don't think that can be extrapolated out, most households don't have an opportunity to deploy more people to work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›