58
submitted 9 months ago by muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ieightpi@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Aren't most Lemmy users left?

[-] LordBelphegor@lemm.ee 36 points 9 months ago

tankies are a special kind of left, to them authoritarianism, genocide and aparthied are ok if it fuels 'the revolution'.

[-] C4RCOSA@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

All governments are Authoritarian, I'm still waiting for proof that Russia is doing anything of the sort (no, rescuing orphans from war-torn cities is not mass deportations of children it is humanitarian aid, many such cases exist around the world of NATO aligned countries doing the exact same thing).

There is a history of evidence of the Donbass bombing before the SMO, and that was a targeted attempt to ethnically cleanse a region, however this was perpetrated by the Azov nazis. The classification of the Uyghurs as a genocide has been disputed by many Islamic countries, as well as the UN itself.

What country has systemic and codified apartheid? Strange claim to make, lol

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 9 months ago

Source?

The US currently runs a system of slave labor camps, has been bombing Muslims and Africans for decades, and Europe has been doing the same for hundreds of years. Are these trustworthy sources of information to tell you about their enemies?

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not to lean to heavy on the whataboutree but you can't really use that as an excuse when the criticism is coming from the left. They don't support the other thing either, so it seems almost like deflection from valid criticism and a missed opportunity to tackle a contradiction.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 9 months ago

The US has > 800 external military bases. Every other country combined has < 20. Which one is credible?

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why don't you apply dialectical materialism and tell me what you think. You'd get a lot farther than using a thought-terminating cliché.

Or put a little more directly, what makes more sense in taking down that behemoth: finding common ground with people who ultimately want the same thing as you, or dying on a hill and banishing anyone who disagrees with something that isn't even relevant in this day and age?

It's a deeply reactionary urge to want to win the ideal at the cost of the material. It's why liberalism has gotten as far as it has.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sure, diamat would say that in the age of super-imperialism that we're now in, where the majority of surplus value comes from super-exploited global-south proletarians, demands that one or a group of countries must use violence to enforce that order, and keep the exploited countries weak and poor.

Capitalism's current enforcer is the US, with its military might, dollar hegemony, and media monopoly. That is why the US has so many external military bases. They don't have them because they're fun to build.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Then you can see how people would want to go from hyperexploitation to no exploitation, rather than daydreaming of the lesser of two evils.

Actually, most people are libs who genuinely got off twitter so they could join bluesky, so they want slightly less hyperexploitation 😒

[-] bigboismith@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You're saying that like Russia and China don't have slave labor camps and haven't been bombing Africans and Muslims for decades.

[-] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 6 points 9 months ago

No, he has said nothing about China or Russia. (Self?) criticism is a sign of maturity and wit. Being a western and adhere to western values doesn't imply assuming justifying it all. In the west we do not have total freedom of speech and/or pluralism of information and, yes, there are worrying "new" forms of slavery.

[-] teichflamme@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You can't say western news aren't trustworthy and then rule out basically any other source of news implied. Unless your point is that news cannot be trusted from anyone ever, which is kinda a moot point.

If you discount the entire west you are left with Russia, China, the middle east, Africa.

None of them have a better track record in human rights violation then the west, which you discredited for exactly that.

[-] bigboismith@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

China and Russia are absolutely relevant, since this post is about tankies. This isn't deflecting critique of the west, it's pointing out the hipocrasy of using these faults in the US as a defence of Russia/China.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago

You’re saying that like Russia and China don’t have slave labor camps and haven’t been bombing Africans and Muslims for decades.

Where on earth are you getting this?? China hasn't been involved in an external conflict since the 60s!

[-] bigboismith@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Admittedly China hasn't militarily invaded another country since it's invasion of Vietnam in 79. Though the Uyghur genocide doesn't strike me as a lot more benevolent than the ongoing wars in Africa and Middle East.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 9 months ago

The majority of the world (notably the vast majority of Muslim countries, who would be burdened with a refugee crisis if there were an actual genocide) doesn't think China is killing Uyghurs. Only the imperial core countries, that have been bombing Muslims for decades think that:

Here's the people telling you that China is killing Muslims:

[-] LordBelphegor@lemm.ee -5 points 9 months ago

Ihttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55794071

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago

Internal documents from the Kunes county justice system from 2017 and 2018, provided to the BBC by Adrian Zenz, a leading expert on China's policies in Xinjiang, detail planning and spending for "transformation through education" of "key groups" - a common euphemism in China for the indoctrination of the Uighurs. In one Kunes document, the "education" process is described as "washing brains, cleansing hearts, strengthening righteousness and eliminating evil".

These have been debunked over and over again, so much so that reddit isn't even buying it anymore. Their source(s) are Zenz, an anti-semitic, anti-abortion, far-right christian fundamentalist, who doesn't speak mandarin, and works for the US state department.

Also, the BBC isn't much more than a tabloid at this point:

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

BBC gets caught doctoring an image from a vlogger in China to make it look depressing, then quietly reverts their change after getting caught.

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

They aren't left enough for the tankies. If you don't want to resolve NATO and burn America/the west to the ground you aren't left enough. You are clearly a filthy conservative liberal if you think otherwise. Also, Tianamen square didn't happen and neither did all the people Stalin massacred and all the body counts from the great leap forward under Mao are totally made up.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Not since the redditors all came over.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

They really did came all over the place.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

"All I said was that the protesters deserved to die! Stop being so mean to meeeeeeee" - this guy, probably.

[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago

That's quite rich considering both lemmygrad and hexbear ban you for asking how a vanguard party is not just another form of bourgeoisie rule.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah pretty much. I've had issues with them too. Isn't the whole point of marxism that you're supposed to point out contradictions?

Like you can give them the benefit of the doubt because nobody wants to deal with shitheads coming in and posting the same reactionary shit over and over again but it just feels a little too tempting to turn that onto people who bring up something you don't have an answer for.

[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

You're not bourgeois if you oppress the working people by turning labor unions into agents of the party and ending their ability to meaningfully participate in government decisions or dissent from those decisions, or eliminate their ability to negotiate their own compensation for their labor, or their ability to start their own businesses. It's only oppression if capitalism because capitalism bad

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 15 points 9 months ago

Its not our fault that reality is Marxist che-si

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

No need for a revolution then, right?

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Lmao that literally just happened to me. Everyone who doesnt praise the invisible hand of the free market is a tankie, apparently.

[-] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think it's really how childish most of them are.

I agree with many things said, but laugh at how 14 year olds think they understand the world better than others simply because something online said something they agreed with.

Most of them say things that validate the fact they haven't stepped foot outside their own western country, but seem to know everything about China and Russia based solely on propaganda. It's hilarious, really

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If there's one thing I'm grateful for, is that the only thing maladjusted internet weirdos are capable of getting done in the real world is being shoved into lockers. The left are out getting shit done, organizing and unionizing. The right are out dying of covid and losing it all to crypto.

[-] teichflamme@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

It's pretty obvious just from the meme and gif responses.

I'd also wager they are not really the popular kind in real life

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My biggest gem is getting an equally heavily upvoted and downvoted comment explaining why I censor the word r---

[-] Fallenwout@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago
[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's real. I did it as a screenshot because I don't want a bunch of people bigrading the original post.

From what I understand lemmy outright lacks the great anti-brigading resources that reddit has, meaning one community can just come in and dogpile on a post in a completely other community and there's no way for anyone to defend against it or even know it's happening. If you don't know just how toxic that is to the website, realize that reddit literally goes as far as to protect leftists when they get dogpiled by nazis. Same site which does everything in its power to suppress anything left of hitler if it can get away with it. Yeah, it's that important.

[-] Fallenwout@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

No i meant is it the word "real"? :p

[-] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago
[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes, it's a "real" word.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"I'm being ostracized for saying we should nuke half the planet based solely on ideology, better sadpost about it"

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Such a funny and entertaining meme made by our sponsor Mematic who is the only meme making tool worth your time

[-] aport@programming.dev -3 points 9 months ago

Two things are true:

  1. There are too many tankies on lemmy
  2. Stalin is responsible for the deaths of millions of Ukranians
[-] C4RCOSA@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

there is this site called reddit that is certified tankie-free, sadly there are too many dronies on lemmy now

wrong, the kulaks were responible for the deaths of millions of Ukrainians

[-] aport@programming.dev -2 points 9 months ago

the kulaks were responible for the deaths of millions of Ukrainians

If you were repeating this Soviet propaganda in 1933 that would be one thing.

However repeating it 90 years later, after we know it's bullshit, well that takes a special kind of stooge.

[-] C4RCOSA@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

10,000,000 died due to communism

If you were repeating this CIA propaganda in 1933 that would be one thing. However repeating it 90 years later, after we know it's bullshit, well that takes a special kind of stooge.

[-] aport@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago

You're going backwards comrade. You're supposed to deny the deaths happened before you blame the kulaks.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Source: The black book of communism

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
58 points (65.9% liked)

Memes

44134 readers
2696 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS