this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Pokémon

3186 readers
1 users here now

The Lemmy community for all things Pokémon!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SPOOSER 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think this is a highly controversial opinion. Most people would agree that most of the old systems were better. However, the fanbase has pretty much given in on the comparative quality of the games as a whole. The way legendaries are handled is a symptom of the greater flaws of the lack of soul in the new games.

[–] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like legendaies lost most of their "oomf" before it was apparent that gamefreak was phoning it in

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Before it was apparent, yeah, but not before they were phoning it in.

[–] SPOOSER 1 points 1 year ago

The way Legendaries were being treated was definitly a mining canary.

[–] flit@guild.pmdcollab.org 2 points 1 year ago

I don't mind Mythical distributions being mostly online nowadays, but I would love to see the in-game story events that you had to go through make a return.

For all of its flaws, I think BDSP did that quite well.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

F* "lol here's Yet Another Raikou" legendary giveaways tbh. Just give me a 2v1 or 3v1 fight against a Legendary that has multiple health bars / phases, enrage timers, can use two moves per turn, and glorious cinematic attacks for their signature moves, à-la Final Fantasy or similar game superbosses.