this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)

pics

24223 readers
905 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Captured from my bedroom

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protist@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That seems like a hard boat to capture. What'd you do with all the people?

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Ransomed them, this view doesn't pay for itself.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn't get on that fucking boat, holy shit.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's supposed to sit like that. Here is another photo from the boat's website that looks the same:

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

In this photo you can see a thin strip of black above the waterline all the way down, and significantly more at the stern and bow.

She does sit pretty low though, you're right.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me either, I like my vacations with more personal space and dry land

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm talking about how low it is in the water; you should be able to see the safety paint above water all along the hull, not just a little bit at the bow.

That thing looks overloaded and waaaaay to apt to capsize.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh damn I don't know shit about boats 😬 that's nuts though, isn't there a regulatory body for boats like this?

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I think it is mostly the insurance companies who demanded it in the first place. I don't know how it works from a regulatory perspective.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought that was an apartment building at first.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Housing problem solved?

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 5 points 1 year ago

Cruise ship. They're basically very sad apartment buildings on water and with more pollution.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely any kind of wave would sink it? 😬

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It looks like it was built for rivers, so no worries of a big wave that would cause concern.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean we have a history of losing steamboats on the Mississippi and Missouri, no they don't take waves well and they're not supposed to get out in bad weather but they often did got swamped with water and exploded, grounded or sank.