this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
150 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

59629 readers
2617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 118 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Why did they allow them in?

I remember we weren’t allowed to and our phones weren’t even as capable when they were “dumb”.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

Fucking pagers were going to end teen life, shortly after Beavis and Butthead were going to ruin America's youth. Then actual horrific data from teen phone use shows up and nothing happens because the Christian right is too busy focusing on people's junk and banning books to raise hell about phones

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago

Right? I remember if you got caught messing with it or it even making noise during class, the teacher took it and you picked it up from the office at the end of the day.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Overly concerned parents want their kid to always carry a phone/tracking device.

I'm sure Life360 parents played a not-so-small part in that decision.

Also school shootings might play a factor.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

The biggest contributing factor was 9/11. My school had 3 pay phones for 1600 students. When 9/11 happened it was chaos. Tons of teachers were letting students use their cell phones (of they had one) so kids could call their parents, and no me had a problem with anyone that had a phone pulling it out of their bag to use it. It felt like almost overnight half the school had a new cell phone that no teacher cared about.

School shootings have just been a continuation of the fact that parents want to know their kids are okay at any given moment.

[–] androogee@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm just guessing that stories of kids trapped in classrooms during school shootings had something to do with it.

But that is purely a guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I don't quite understand why this is still a thing? Back when I was in school in the late 2000s, phones were banned. Couldn't even bring it out even if you were going to use it as a calculator. Immediate 3 hour detection if you were seen with one. I got one for calling my mother to pick me up because I needed to go to the doctor.

I don't understand how between now and then, the rules seemed to lax.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You haven't really spent any time near a school system have you? I don't even refer to them as parental units anymore, they are just banshees. These awful horrible screaming demons that want you to raise their kid but also never discipline them.

[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope I have not. I don't have kids. I have heard your comment said by many other teachers around too. I don't understand how it got to be like this. If people really don't want the responsibility, time, money, emotional and physical investments of raising kids, they shouldn't be having them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

I got in trouble for trying to use a payphone to call my mother to pick me up on a day when they cancelled school after it started due to worsening ice conditions. I didn't have permission to use the phone and my teacher got on my ass.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 44 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They have been banned for over a year where I live. I guess the people pushing back against this policy are just completely ignorant of the issue. Smartphones are incredibly addicting by design and, aside from the academic problem, exposing developing brains to such devices 24/7 is just a really bad idea. Having a space where children and their peers can be smartphone-free for several hours a day, several days a a week, should be seen as a positive thing.

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not the smartphones themselves are addictive, but all these annoying social apps, advertisements and notifications are.

There are ways around this. Kids should learn how to use their phones for managing their lives. And actually, they do at some point - to a degree.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago

I'm glad phones weren't banned when I was still in school but it would've been better for me if they were. I think this is one of those things where we need an authority to prevent us from doing something that's bad for us because we're not going to do it ourselves. It's equivalent to mom telling you to eat your vegetables.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Here in Europe many schools are doing this too. As a father of an (almost) teenger, I'm they are.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Got two teenagers. I’d outlaw smart phones for anyone under 18 if it was up to me. Bring the flame!

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We got our oldest a smart phone a few years ago. Based on that experience, our younger two can buy their own smartphones when they're adults because we've decided we're not going to repeat that mistake.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sort of the same here. Our 17 and 14 year olds were the last in their classes to get one and I still felt it was too early.

And for those without kids, here’s my actual story about what smart phones do to children: I was recently visiting an enormous aquarium abroad; just tank after tank of impressive displays.

As we arrived we realised, ok wow, shark feeding is literally now, let’s go watch it. It had obviously drawn an enormous crowd of families but eventually we got ourselves into a position where we could see. And then my wife tapped my shoulder and pointed and I noticed what she had noticed: At prime viewing position, on these pedestal sort of things, were sitting a row of teenagers, all of them, to the very last boy and girl, hunched over and staring at their smartphones.

LITERAL SHARKS WERE BEING HAND FED RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM and they couldn’t give a shit because PHONES!!!

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

No, you're right.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (9 children)

I strongly disagree, this should be a decision for parents to make, no need to get the law involved. However, schools can and should have a policy that phones need to be off (or at least silenced, no vibrate) during class, and they can check it if excused to go to the restroom or something. But I would never agree to a law banning access to phones for minors, that's a violation of parental discretion.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Society used to think crack was bad, and then invented smartphones.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Banning phones in schools needs to be done very cautiously.

In my high school, one of my teachers had one of the best cell phone policies I'd experienced, which was simply, if you had your phone out, she'd just say "hey, what are you doing on your phone right now?" It didn't matter what exactly it was, and there was no judgement passed, but it kept us engaged if we got too distracted, encouraged us to find and share interesting new topics over just doomscrolling, and led to some legitimately informative and valuable conversations.

Other classes would let you use your phone after you got your work done, which acted more as an incentive for completing your work, rather than something you had to sneak in between the teacher talking.

That said, my high school was a competency-based school, which changed the incentives for self-governance of the learning process compared to traditional high school. And of course, it was high school, where most students had better self control.

That might say more about the state of education than the dynamics of phone use in the classroom, but I do feel like schools often try to make students conform to the system as their almost exclusive goal, rather than making the system work for the student, and thus, harsh anti-phone policies aimed at increasing attention in the classroom actually just make students even more angry at the system of schooling, and less likely to enjoy the process of education as a whole.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 5 points 3 months ago

I have mixed feelings. "Because I said so" can get compliance in high school, but that's mostly it. It's not going to be that effective. At the same time, a lot of this overly permissive parenting seems like a reaction by people who are upset about being told no as kids and that will lead to problems, especially once they get into places that don't care about constantly trying to have a debate back and fourth.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 9 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Before phones, students were distracted by fidget toys, tamagochi, bubble gum, various collectibles, comic books, ordinary books, paper notes, drawing, pen twitching, etc.etc.

Students always find ways to get distracted. Take away everything and they'll still be rocking on the chair.

So if the purpose of banning distractions is to make students more attentive, well.. it's just not going to do that.

Then there is online bullying. Has bullying actually increased or are we just seeing it more, because it's now documented? Banning phones in school won't stop it from happening outside school hours anyway.

I'm not advocating for allowing phones in schools during lectures or anything, but it's pretty clear to me that an outright ban is an outdated solution that will only hide the issues instead of solving them.

[–] reliv3@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

The smartphone is a different beast. Hardware and software companies spent millions of dollars of R&D to create the most psychologically addicting and attention demanding device as possible.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

May I gently ask if you have children in the phone age range?

I have never seen anything with such a hold over teenagers.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's absolutely crack. My nephew and niece is 7 and 4, they don't watch a lot of tv and aren't allowed on the phone a lot, but when they are it's fucking crazy. They don't even have to do anything on it. When he was 5 and his friend was also 5, we had a Christmas family party. My phone was on the table and it blinked. No joke, they were like zombies, starring my phone down. He reached for it and i told him not to touch it. Their fingers kept moving on their own, and all they could to is stt the time, yet that was the most interesting thing in the universe to them. They were unable to not touch it.

When they are allowed on the phone for like 15 minutes all they do is to watch the biggest most meaningless garbage i can imagine. They would pick looking at a phone over pretty much anything. Before my sister had kids i would always think the whole ipad kids thing is blown out of proportion and i would teach them things with it, because after all, it is a useful tool. Not anymore, fuck that. I feel bad for ipad kids, i can only imagine the brain rot.

I have kids that age and a little older, and we have strict rules on screen time because of this. When I ask what they want to do, two will be uninterested in watching something on the TV or tablet, but if I let the other do it, they'll all watch whatever is on the screen. My kids will try to grab my phone from me randomly during the day, and if I'm doing anything on my phone or computer, they'll try to see what I'm doing. If I let them watch something on YouTube or something, they'll watch stupid, high-engagement videos (e.g. Minecraft "challenges" or whatever), and my oldest was practically addicted to a toy review channel (they weren't even interested in the toys) until I banned YouTube entirely (we let them choose how to use their allotted screen time).

There's no way I'm letting them have a phone until they can demonstrate the smallest bit of restraint. I'm considering leaving my old phone around for emergency calls, but I know the moment I let them access it, they'll get on the internet and watch random videos.

I think devices can be a fantastic learning tool, and I sometimes let them use my devices for educational reasons occasionally, but even then, they need strict limits on total time and per session time. We let them "earn" time by reading, but again, we have those strict limits so they don't binge.

When my kids can be trusted with a phone, I'm not going to let them bring it unless they have a legitimate reason to have it at school (e.g. they have an after school activity w/o a fixed end time).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have children, including a teen, and they have phones.

One thing I do notice is that they're quite a lot better at putting the phone away when they're with friends doing stuff or at family dinners than their grandparents who keeps checking notifications and answering calls regardless of when and where.

They grew up with phones and they have a much better understanding of when it's socially acceptable to use it.

They know not use the phone during class, so there's really no good reason to ban it entirely.

[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That's your kids which are in the minority.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Their friends are pretty good too. Whenever they hang out they do other stuff. They plan to meet for some purpose and that's what they do. Keeping up to date on social media is something they do on their own time when they're bored.

It's like they grow out of it, once they've seen enough crap.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I know one family like that. Kids prefer activities to phones. But the rest not so much. The kids get together and do things in spurts separated by phone time. Usually whatever they are doing, at least one of them is on the phone. So it is really kid dependent.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fijxu@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Some drugs are just stronger than the others.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not advocating for allowing phones in schools during lectures or anything, but it's pretty clear to me that an outright ban is an outdated solution that will only hide the issues instead of solving them.

While I don't disagree, social media is the problem and what are schools going to do about that, except for banning phones? You also can't compare getting distracted by a pen or piece of paper, to a phone with bright colours and notifications, specifically designed to be as addicting as possible

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 9 points 3 months ago

Outright bans are because government bodies are scared of nuance. You can also see this in "zero-tolerance" policies that do things like punish the victim because they were "involved" in a fight, or punish a kid who nibbles a chicken nugget into the shape of a gun.

To be fair to schools, nuance is hard. Suppose that the rule is "phones may not interrupt class." Now, what counts as an interruption may vary between classes, between teachers, and based on what's happening in class. A student may use it during a quiet period in the class when they've already completed their work, and that's acceptable. A different student will then use their phone ten minutes later, when they're supposed to be doing something. The second student will get in trouble, but then complain that the first student didn't get in trouble. The parent will hear, "Brayden was using his phone and he didn't get in trouble but the second I used mine, I got in trouble. The teacher has it out for me."

If you've talked to any teachers in the past few decades, a common theme is parents siding with their kids against all logic, reason, and evidence. They'll assume that teachers are petty goblins, just looking for an excuse to pick on their kid. And parents can be outright hostile and unreasonable. When my wife was a teacher, she received more than one actual death threat from parents because she enforced rules that did NOT have any nuance or discretion. Imagine if enforcing the rule was up to the teacher's discretion versus an outright ban.

tl;dr I agree that a ban is silly, but I totally get why schools are doing it.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I'm sorry, but there's a wildly huge difference between bubble gum/collectibles/comic books and internet connected cell phones.

I was terrible at paying attention in class, but I always made it through by hearing just enough to get by... until I was in my final year of college when some of the classes got internet connected desktops at every desk. In normal classes I'd be fine, but in the classes with a computer where I could IM with friends I failed miserably (literally went from straight A's to C's and a couple F's in college classes because of internet connected computers being in front of me all the time). And that was a desktop with only a couple friends I knew who also had IM on at the time. I can't imagine how poorly I would have done at school if every one of my friends had messaging on every minute of every day, not to mention mobile gaming and social media.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I think there is a difference.

Yeah, the tamagotchi are games, but they are a game in the singular sense.

All the things you mention as distractions except the food items are contained in one phone multiple times over. Heck, you could probably even find a bubblegum chewing app.

That’s the distraction potential contained in one phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DBT@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don’t wanna click. Too easy to cheat?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 95 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The article is about how smartphones have made people lazy. So incredibly lazy that some people aren't even reading short articles from reputable sources, but are instead using smartphones to write comments on the internet begging strangers to summarize things for them.

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

That was brutal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Seems to be a combination of students too distracted playing on their phones and difficulty policing behavior on social media bleeding into school time. They give an example of students filming a student being bullied on school grounds and the video being uploaded and shared on social media. I'm not sure banning smart phones during school hours is the right solution, but it's certainly a tricky problem to deal with.

load more comments
view more: next ›