this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
91 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2837 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Sept. 1, Texas is slated to open its new business courts, a brand-new legal system backed by Big Oil — and several of the court’s main judges have in the past represented fossil fuel companies as lawyers, The Lever has found.

The judges were hand-picked over the last two months by Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, a major recipient of oil industry cash — and many can be quickly replaced if they hand down decisions he opposes, a judicial design that he championed.

The courts consist of 11 regional business courts and a new statewide court of appeals to hear appellate litigation, which are expected to have immediate impacts on environmental cases in the state. As Public Health Watch, an independent investigative news organization, reported last month, a suite of cases involving state environmental authorities will now be transferred from a generally liberal appeals court to the state’s new Fifteenth Court of Appeals, created to oversee the business courts.

There, these cases will be decided by a panel of conservative judges historically friendly to industry — particularly oil and gas interests, a powerful force in Texas.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sucks to be a Texan, especially one who voted for these shitheel corrupt grifters.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The most effective GOTV operations for Republicans tend to be in O&G towns. Midland is a city powered by natural gas, and everyone knows it. These courts are to protect an industry that pays better than practically any other industry in the state besides College Football Couch.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Its crazy how these people are just creating their own self reinforcing reality. They literally went and made their own with blackjack and probably underage hookers. Can't be fucked in court when its a court filled with my buddies. Burn it all fucken down.

[–] explodes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Where are these guillotines we keep talking about?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Brother have you got a match?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I keep 3 on me at all times. Never know when theres a bridge you'll burn.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Anyone able to get any additional context?

Like how is this possible compared to say California opening up its own “court of owls/shenanigans” or moreover how can a state magically force a court system that could change a corporation’s obligations to federal law?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

The Lever - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Lever:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.levernews.com/justice-brought-to-you-by-big-oil/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support