this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
116 points (96.8% liked)

YUROP

1200 readers
5 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The readability improved with the right, the 5 is almost completely unreadable when I move my phone away (I'm near sighted)

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not from Europe and I thought the top one said 150 on the old bill. The readability is much better and consistent in the new ones.

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Oh hell, i thought that was 150!

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like that the new ones have more distinct size differences, for people who may be blind this is great as it is easier to tell which note is which by feel, preventing a lot of blind folks getting short-changed.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I think the new series also has some tactile strips on the side which should also help

[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 month ago

I really like the new ones with the green coated numbers

[–] LNRDrone@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

I guess the readability on the new set is way better. The bills have always been pretty much whatever for me though, I like the coins though. Especially the 1 and 2 euro ones.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Over here in America just jealous of colorful money.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

US bills should be different sizes for the visually impaired. The mint lost their court case, yet here we are still with bills that are all the same size.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/issuing-onesize-dollar-bills-is-unfair-to-the-blind-us-appeal-court-rules-832157.html

[–] eutampieri@feddit.it 6 points 1 month ago
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish we have euro.
But on the other hand, both have boring design.
I have vary strong bias, see how polish currency notes look.

[–] Mesophar@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, Polish currency looks pretty dope

[–] hawgietonight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ones I really like are the six missing

[–] d_k_bo@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Five. A new 500 € banknote has never been issued.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some fuckwit gave me one of those in payment one time. He even laughed and said "Good luck with that"

Yes, you have to take them to the bank, nobody else will touch them

[–] hawgietonight@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In the early days of the euro I got paid fully in cash and every now and then I got one of those in the envelope. I don't recall having trouble to pay with it... but those days are gone and haven't seen a 500 note in ages.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Not only they are not accepted in most private places, I think they are being recalled and slowly brought out of circulation

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate it when countries redesign money on a constant cycle (looking at you, US quarters). Hopefully these new designs stay in circulation for a long time.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

A reminder that the "new" 5€ note is as old as the old one was when the new was released. First series was 11 years old (2002-2013), new is also 11 years old (2013-2024). Higher value notes were introduced later though

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Eleven years isn’t that long. I’d like to see designs stick around for 20 to 50 years. Redesigning and reprinting money is expensive, and it loses its familiarity and icon status every time it’s redesigned. You also open up confusion where it’s easier to pass counterfeits to tourists, etc. who are unfamiliar with which designs are accurate.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nobody is about to redesign it again. I think having exactly TWO designs ever is completely fair and you cannot speak of any unnecessarily frequent changes here. The redesign that did happen was crucial for security (a lot of new anti-forgery features added, included ones that are meant to be easy to check for tourists or otherwise) and accessibility.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

What I meant is that if they don't feel the need tp redo it again after the same amount of time, it must mean there was a good reason to do it before, and they probably addressed all the problems they wanted (mainly about security). Also I don't feel like the iconic look changed that much. The format is the same, the color is the same, and the buldings are similar

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago
[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

50 needed an update I wish they would have went with negative space numbers and not just shifted then into the center. Imagine a "white" number in the upper right. ☯️

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I just wish we could adopt the plastic material like Australia and Canada

[–] fuzzy_feeling@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ich vermiss den heiermann...

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Kauf ihn Dir. Ich hab auch noch einen im Schrank (irgendeine Sonderausgabe wegen wasweißich).

[–] eutampieri@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago

I also like that all the four were signed by the same guy (Trichet?), while the new one are Draghi Lagarde Draghi Lagarde

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

i think i like the new version of all but 5 most, that's the only one where the illustration doesn't blend into the background properly.

Also the way the arch on the tenner is cut off halway is strange

[–] ardorhb@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

I like the newer version more but to be honest the euro is still a very boring looking currency.

[–] ma1w4re@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I like yuan more

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Can't tell which one is new and which is old.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Euro notes look like what you'd get if you asked for prop banknotes for a minor scwne in a nwar-future sci-fi movie. The basic design elements are there to give the general look of currency, but something always seemed missing.

I think it's the lack of text-- most banknotes have a big, prominent issuing authority name rather than the tiny copyright line of abbreviations, and often some flowery "I promise to pay on demand" legal language leftover from when the note was a stand-in for a stack of silver coins.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago

i feel like you get this impression just because they're colourful, which like.. monopoly money is colourful because that makes it super easy for people with full vision to tell them apart, and as it turns out that's useful for actual legal tender as well :O

[–] cron@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think text makes any sense. As you can see, we have three ways of writing "euro".

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's more about "does it fulfill the tropes paper money has established." It's like how many of the new electric cars look slightly off because they've removed design features (i. e. grilles with obvious air intakes) that are established in cars already.

Interestingly, Soviet banknotes up to the 1961 series would print the denomination in over ten different languages.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Firstly, the issuing authority's abbreviation is there. In all the languages. Secondly, the denomination is printed in a way that's intelligible to all nations :)