this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
861 points (91.4% liked)

solarpunk memes

3009 readers
50 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (15 children)

Simple. People desire to own what they pay for, and they prefer not having to hear their neighbors partying, arguing, fighting, fucking, etc.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: they didn't need to clear all the trees, or at the very least, they could have replaced them with more native trees once they were done building. I'm not gonna pretend that houses don't cause a ton of environmental destruction, but imo they really don't have to continue to be destructive long-term; they do it because people usually go with the lowest bidder.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: they didn’t need to clear all the trees

You're not laying plumbing and electric through an old growth forest. The roots of those trees won't allow it. You've got to clear the whole lot and then replant.

they could have replaced them with more native trees

That would require a local nursery specializing in the cultivation of native plants at the scale the developer requires. At the industrial level, its easier to just ship in some stock variants, whether they work locally or not.

From an ecological level, it is easier to simply not break things than it is to fix them afterwards. Stripping the soil and resodding it, tearing up all the old plants and replanting, and kicking out the native wildlife for years at a time isn't in any way conducive to ecological preservation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] retrolasered@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

*slaps cheap cladding

"This cladding can burn and kill so many people so well"

(Genuinely though, Grenfell was ridiculously tragic, and its disgusting how making decisions to cut costs and be cheap cost lives, I mean in no way to be mocking that. I'm sorry for any losses you may have incurred in such a tragedy yourself.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago (14 children)

A lot of people in this thread are mistaking the map for the territory. Like yes, obviously neither the development on the right, or the left would actually happen in real life, because why are these people even on the island? What do they eat? What do they drink? Where do they work? The sole statement of the graphic is that dense developments have a reduced impact on nature compared to sparse developments. Discussing the logistics would exceed what can be conveyed by such a format.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Neither have water, so neither?

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 8 points 3 months ago

Obviously the blue part is land

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

We all know that soon enough, the center of the island will be filled with cheap appartement blocks, and all the beaches and access to water will be owned by rich people with huge houses.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Dang, Lemmy really is misanthrope central

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

There is so much possible between these. Both options suck.

Different families have different needs.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why build up when we can build down to utilize geothermal. Under ground houses saves nature!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (6 children)

my only gripe with apartments is that people are too fucking stupid to sort their garbage and recycling according to the giant fucking posters in the garbage room.

and strata vote manipulation to make idiotic changes that benefit nobody that actually lives there, while never fixing anything that breaks.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I could get behind this if I could continue yelling just for the fun of it and have a space for a decent workshop

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You could go out to the middle of the forest and yell, would disturb less people that way anyway.

You could also have a community workshop in the basement like how a lot of buildings have gyms these days. Similar to gyms it would probably have more machines as well since the cost can be spread out. You probably can't justify buying a lathe for one project but a lathe for a whole apartment block makes more sense.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The community workshop would be shut down by the insurance company within a year.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (10 children)

so many people in comments need fucking therapy. idolizing atomization and misanthropy and then wondering why the world has gone to shit. "fuck other people and their children" Andys wondering how fascism is on the rise and why people do mass shootings. it's you. the only difference is you haven't pulled the trigger yet. get help.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 months ago

This thread is an object lesson in why the whole world hates Americans.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Density zoning is the source of the housing crisis.

People think it's market forces that have created the housing crisis, but it is exactly the opposite: government ha been artificially restricting supply for decades.

There are so many places where 100 units is a more profitable use of land than 10 units, but it's prevented by density zoning.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The people who have the most wealth and power over the markets are the very same people who bribe / lobby/ donate to politicians to write the zoning laws that contribute to the housing crisis.

Consider this, you are a wealthy property developer. Are you going to lobby the government to do things to bring down the cost of housing? Fuck no. You're going to do the opposite. The more expensive housing is the more money you make.

People need to realize the US only pretends to be a democracy. We get to pick which individuals get to sell us out to the lobbyists and donors and without fail both parties put on a big show of political theater but then meet with lobbyists in private and sell us out. A democratic republic if only democratic if the elected reps represent the will of the people, which they don't.

I would even argue that a two party system is deeply undemocratic and that we will never be a real democracy until we adopt a multiparty system, ban super PAC donations, and ban paid lobbyists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] capital@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Only if the apartment has very strict noise and smoking rules that are actually enforced.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›