this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
281 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
4038 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 minutes ago

Every single one of us, as kids, learned the concept of "garbage in, garbage out"; most likely in terms of diet and food intake.

And yet every AI cultist makes the shocked pikachu face when they figure out that trying to improve your LLM by feeding it on data generated by literally the inferior LLM you're trying to improve, is an exercise in diminishing returns and generational degradation in quality.

Why has the world gotten both "more intelligent" and yet fundamentally more stupid at the same time? Serious question.

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If mainstream blogs are writing about it, what would make someone think that AI companies haven't thoroughly dissected the problem and are already working on filtering out AI fingerprints from the training data set? If they can make a sophisticated LLM, chances are they can find methods to XOR out generated content.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

oh no are we gonna have to appreciate the art of human beings? ew. what if they want compensation‽

[–] brey1013@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tamkish@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago
[–] Rider@eviltoast.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Sooner or later it is supposed to happen, but I don't think we are quite there....Yet.

[–] levzzz@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

Fake news, just like that one time Nightshade "killed" stable diffusion (literally had no effect) Flux came out not long ago and it's better than ever

[–] mac@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

is it not relatively trivial to pre-vet content before they train it? at least with aigen text it should be.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It depends on what you are looking for. Identifying AI generated data is generally hard, though it can be done in specific cases. There is no mathematical difference between the 1s and 0s that encoded AI generated data and any other data. Which is why these model collapse ideas are just fantasy. There is nothing magical about any data that makes it "poisonous" to AI. The kernel of truth behind these ideas is not likely to matter in practice.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is these AI companies currently exist on the business model of not paying for information, and that generally includes not wanting to pay content curators.

Google is probably the only one in a position to potentially outsource by making everyone solve a "does this hand look normal to you" CAPTCHA

They can try and train AI to detect AI, but that's also difficult.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

So it's not a problem with AI. It's just a problem for some mayfly companies that try to profit from the latest trend?

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of like how true thoughts and opinions on complex topics are boiled down to digestible concepts for others to understand who then perpetuate those concepts without understanding them and the meaning degrades and we dont think anymore, just repeat stuff in social media comments.

Side note... this article sucks and seems like it was ai generated. Repetitive and no author credit? Just says it was originally posted elsewhere.

Generative AI isnt in danger of being killed as this clickbait titled suggests... just hindered.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

hindered.

I doubt that.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago

More like degenerative AIs

[–] emiellr@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago

Wait now hold on a minute. Why would I want to do this? Is this activism by people against LLMs in general or..? I'm confused as to why I would want to do this.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"Model collapse" is just a fancy way of saying "our stupid ideas are bad and nobody wants them."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 26 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Old news? Seems to be a subject of several papers for some time now. Synthetic data has been used successfully already for very specific domains.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Yup, old news and wrong news. Also so many people who hate AI but don't understand how it works. Pretty disappointing for a technology community.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 92 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It is their own fault for poisoning the internet with their slop.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

In case anyone doesn't get what's happening, imagine feeding an animal nothing but its own shit.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 10 hours ago

Photocopy of a photocopy is my go-to metaphor for model collapse.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

I use the "Sistermother and me are gonna have a baby!" example personally, but I am a awful human so

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not shit, but isn't that what brought about mad cow disease? Farmers were feeding cattle brain matter that had infected prions. Idk if it was cows eating cow brains or other animals though.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It was the remains of fish which we ground into powder and fed to other fish and sheep, whose remains we ground into powder and fed to other sheep and cows, whose remains we ground to powder and fed to other cows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 34 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

…………………. Good?

[–] emiellr@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

Tbh I'm a bit lost on the purpose of this

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

The solution for this is usually counter training. Granted my experience is on the opposite end training ai vision systems to id real objects.

So you train up your detector ai on hand tagged images. When it gets good you use it to train a generator ai until the generator is good at fooling the detector.

Then you train the detector on new tagged real data and the new ai generated data. Once it's good at detection again you train the generator ai on the new detector.

Repeate several times and you usually get a solid detector and a good generator as a side effect.

The thing is you need new real human tagged data for each new generation. None of the companies want to generate new human tagged data sets as it's expensive.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 147 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

Let's go, already!

How you can help: If you run a website and can filter traffic by user agent, get a list of the known AI scrapers agent strings and selectively redirect their requests to pre-generated AI slop. Regular visitors will see the content and the LLM scraper bots will scrape their own slop and, hopefully, train on it.

[–] azl@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

This would ideally become standardized among web servers with an option to easily block various automated aggregators.

Regardless, all of us combined are a grain of rice compared to the real meat and potatoes AI trains on - social media, public image storage, copyrighted media, etc. All those sites with extensive privacy policies who are signing contracts to permit their content for training.

Without laws (and I'm not sure I support anything in this regard yet), I do not see AI progress slowing. Clearly inbreeding AI models has a similar effect as in nature. Fortunately there is enough original digital content out there that this does not need to happen.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Regardless, all of us combined are a grain of rice compared to the real meat and potatoes AI trains on

Absolutely. It's more a matter of principle for me. Kind of like the digital equivalent of leaving fake Amazon packages full of dog poo out front to make porch pirates have a bad day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 64 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Model collapse is just a euphemism for “we ran out of stuff to steal”

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

All such news make me want to live to the time when our world is interesting again. Real AI research, something new instead of the Web we have, something new instead of the governments we have. It's just that I'm scared of what's between now and then. Parasites die hard.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 30 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It's more ''we are so focused on stealing and eating content, we're accidently eating the content we or other AI made, which is basically like incest for AI, and they're all inbred to the point they don't even know people have more than two thumb shaped fingers anymore."

[–] EgoNo4@lemmy.world 73 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

More like... Degenerative AI *ba dum tsss

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mwa@lemm.ee -2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

remember how nfts feel off (due to how they lost their value) have a theory that ais will come to the same fate cause they cannot train (it according to the article?)

[–] Jomega@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Good riddance.

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 42 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

This sounds like AI is literally biting its own tail

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 29 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

So they made garbage AI content, without any filtering for errors, and they fed that garbage to the new model, that turned out to produce more garbage. Incredible discovery!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] thejml@lemm.ee 29 points 23 hours ago (12 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

If only the generated output also looked more and more like how inbred humans do.

Like insane rambling from LLMs, and the humans generated by AI had various developmental disorders and the Habsburg jaw.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 12 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I think anyone familiar with the laws of thermodynamics could have predicted this outcome.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 22 hours ago

Cool, let's try to ruin it faster!

load more comments
view more: next ›