this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
1334 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

59593 readers
5048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm happy to see this being noticed more and more. Google wants to destroy the open web, so it's a lot at stake.

Google basically says "Trust us". What a joke.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antony@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

While you are at it, convince Apple to allow Firefox on iOS, and decline to use WEI in Safari. Otherwise there's no way to avoid WEI on iPhone, and only one mainstream rendering engine free of this insidious malware. Many companies will shy away from it if it breaks mobile apps on the Apple platform.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Would WEI stop Adblock by DNS? Like pihole or similar ?

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From my very basic understanding of it yes. It in effect checks what's loaded against what was served and if there's a discrepancy it does its thing.

Note. If I have misunderstood please someone correct me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Yes and no. They can freely enforce a specific DNS server and reject any browser with a custom one as "tampered with". Just like they can freely enforce any part of your system being like they want it to be "or else".

[–] takeda@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of that can be easily checked via JavaScript, but now if you world use extensions to disable those checks you would not pass the attestation.

So yeah, essentially you no longer have control over your computer, and need to bend over and accept everything the site owner wishes to do.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

bend over and accept everything the site owner wishes to do.

Including a malicious site owner's wishes.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] under2x@lemdit.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well passed time to do some monopoly busting.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Monopoly busting. Ecosystem lock-in. Right to repair. Software patent reform. Privacy and AI regulation.

What do lawmakers even do these days anyway?

[–] charliespider@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

What do lawmakers even do these days anyway?

Accept bribes. Insider trading. Forment outrage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrDrProfJimmy@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

There's no way there's a legitimate argument why this is good for us/the internet

[–] moog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it says something about "spoofing identity" which raises a good question. If this does happen, how difficult would it be to just lie about your client environment with a spoofer of some sort?

[–] takeda@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's exactly what it is trying to prevent. Basically you, as an user is not to be trusted, so the website and your own computer work together to prevent you from doing anything the site deems inappropriate, like spoofing things, blocking ads etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›