this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
106 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39386 readers
182 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Berkeley has this really cool program called BOINC that you can download and donate your computer's resources to processing scientific data. There are a bunch of projects to pick, from working on climate change, to cancer, to the Large Hadron Collider.

The good folks at linuxserver.io even have a ready to go Docker container for easy setup: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/boinc

Another possibility is running the Archive Team's Warrior, which downloads data from at risk web sites and uploads them to the Internet Archive: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/ArchiveTeam_Warrior

Does anyone else have examples of projects like this? My dream is for the Fediverse to have this sort of feature eventually.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rah@feddit.uk 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you mean by "spare"? Modern CPUs scale their electricity usage according to utilisation.

[–] eros@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One would assume they mean sitting around, doing nothing. Some would rather use some electricity to support a good cause than have the computing power sit there idle.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

That makes sense. Thank you.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

would rather use some electricity to support a good cause than have the computing power sit there idle.

That's not "spare" though. That's my point.

[–] eros@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, but no. It is spare capacity, so it's spare in one way.

I have hundreds of gigaflops of computing power sitting idle 80% of the time, I just don't think the taxpayers would appreciate the power bill if I put it all to use like that. But at home I can spare a few cycles on my solar power sipping Proxmox cluster.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have a spare room in my house sat idle 80% of the time. I could easily install a few racks of servers in there and have some gigaflops of computing power to contribute.

But actually, being "idle" isn't the same thing as "spare" because it would cost a lot of money to install racks of servers, just as it costs money to run computations on an otherwise idle computer.

So I mean no, but no. It's only spare capacity in a stupid, convoluted way that's disconnected from common sense and common usage of the word.

But you managed to brag about having hundreds of gigaflops of taxpayer-funded computing at your fingertips so good for you, you go for that validation from strangers on the Internet.

[–] eros@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Idle computing capacity that installed, online, but is not being used all the time is exactly what I thought the OP was talking about and calling spare. They said computing power to spare, not space or equipment. I don't understand your argument about installing equipment, that to me isn't what OP was talking about. 🤷‍♀️ Kinda like the spare capacity that CompuServe had from their time sharing service that they used to bring their online service to the masses at night.

Sorry you didn't appreciate my reply. I was trying to explain my point with real examples from my experience. I don't need your validation. I kinda regret trying to make you see both sides now. But whatever, you do you.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I use a VPS. They don't charge based on CPU utilization so I run Folding@Home on it.

[–] tetra@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please only do this on plans with a dedicated vCPU that isn't shared with other users.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

For now, until economics catches up with you :-) Enjoy it while it lasts I suppose.

[–] CaptObvious@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve participated in their SETI and cancer research projects in the past. It’s a good cause, and I don’t mind making a donation.

I did think the BOINC project was shut down, though. Good to know it’s still going.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My very cursory understanding is that SETI was shutting down, but BOINC (so folding etc) should still be going.

[–] CaptObvious@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s really good to know. Thanks!

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now I know this is being done with encryption, but an open tunnel direct to your non dmz-ed system, is just begging to be hacked, and it will be, without a shadow of doubt.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

In what sense is this "opening a direct tunnel?"

I don't think you really understand what's going on here; or otherwise, I don't.

I've used BOINC without issue for over a decade.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As far as I know, the BOINC client just pulls down new data for processing when each batch of work is done. There's no pushing and no open tunnel or port. The software risk would be malicious code in a particular project (e.g. if it said it was folding proteins but actually mined bitcoins). I hope there's some vetting of project code.

The other risk is hardware (especially CPU and RAM) running its lifetime down more quickly because of the continual heavier usage.