this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
79 points (85.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1093 readers
157 users here now

Be respectful

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] christophski@feddit.uk 10 points 14 hours ago

Soo… barely any change? Very misleading charts

[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Line graphs of percentages not based at zero make it difficult for me to grok the magnitude of changes. Missed opportunity for the hue line color to match the actual hue in the vertical. Just being an angle value I have no idea what hue it's supposed to be.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not a colorologist, but how the hell do you measure saturation and hue in a poster?

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

Not a colorololologist either, but I'm guessing, you scan it and then calculate the average of the individual pixels. You can convert RGB color values to HSV color values to get the hue, saturation and value.

But calculating the average of the hue degrees (like was done for this post) is non-sense.
0° is red, as is 360°, so you get completely different averages, depending on how you calculate them:

  • (0°+120°+240°) / 3 → 120° (green)
  • (360°+120°+240°) / 3 → 240° (blue)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Well. They have certainly lost value.