this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
173 points (98.3% liked)

World News

38861 readers
2580 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

South Korea has summoned the Russian ambassador, seeking the "immediate withdrawal" of North Korean troops which it says are being trained to fight in Ukraine.

About 1,500 North Korean soldiers, including those from the special forces, have already arrived in Russia, according to Seoul's spy agency.

In a meeting with the ambassador Georgiy Zinoviev, South Korea's vice-foreign minister Kim Hong-kyun denounced the move and warned that Seoul will "respond with all measures available".

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

I've been curious about this, since the United States and South Korea are both still at war with North Korea and the latter is sending troops into Ukraine, doesn't that mean that it's an active combat zone for both of us? Seems like all the pretext you would need to move troops into the area.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

OH SHIT UKRAINIAN K2s?!????? PLEASE YES PLEEEEEEASE

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

why does anyone in existence think that goose-stepping isn't the dumbest goofiest looking bullshit anyone's ever done? i say this in a world where dabbing and planking have been things

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Basically because Prussia developed it as a way of keeping soldiers in rigidly drilled formation advancing in lines towards defensive positions with muskets, because before rifles were common in military advancing in a tightly coordinated firing line in the face defensive musket fire was a devastatingly effective tactic but which required a lot of training and discipline. The Prussian army became famously successful while using it and it became very in style. As rifles became more common on the battlefield and defensive fire became more accurate it became obsolete as a tactic but it stuck as a ceremonial "impressive" looking thing. Now that everyone who remembers it being a real effective combat tactic is long dead and it's just associated with Nazis and the Soviet Union... Well... It basically just summons images of authoritarian military parades and people who get hard for that kind of thing are still into it and everyone else thinks it's stupid as hell.

That said, formal marching is still very much a thing in most if not all militaries, and it does tend to focus on rigidity and body control and very purposeful movements. Marching without bending the knees is a semi easy way of simplifying it so that every soldier seems to be moving the same way, which is often the goal of the effect, otherwise you have to train the exact time and angle which people are bending their knees and correcting for people with different length legs.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

Really great explanation! Thanks!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Ah Prussia, the root cause of so much military ridiculousness

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Seoul will “respond with all measures available”.

Perhaps the law that forbids arms exports to warfighting countries could be re-examined? Wouldn't even need to toss the whole thing, a new law could probably be passed to create an exception.

I'm sure some of S Korea's gigantic reserves of 155mm would make a very significant difference.

Or, a few battalions of those shiny K2 Black Panthers, which Poland signed a deal an absolute shitload of a couple years back. This’d be outstanding battlefield testing for them, tbh.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago

SK has mostly kept from supplying Ukraine. Closest they have gotten is selling shells to the US to open up more US shells to go to Ukraine. I could see SK changing their stance about supplying Ukraine over this.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I would think that fewer DPRK soldiers on the Korean peninsula, and more or them defecting, captured, wounded, or killed in Ukraine would be good for South Korea.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think DPRK's hope is that at least some soldiers and officers will return with some modern combat experience, something that their military organization is dreadfully lacking. It could end up being a bigger problem down the road for ROK even if they lose a few thousand bodies.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

They can't really take them back they've seen the outside world.