this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
67 points (98.6% liked)

3DPrinting

15528 readers
88 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago
[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

Must be horrible to get the print bed leveled.

[–] faebudo@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Room-scale DnD dungeons anyone?

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

And it'll only take 3-4 months to print it!...oh, and you can't really use your home while it prints because of noise and VOCs.

[–] NessD@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Crank up that in-floor-heating! The printer's running!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

So many questions...

Does it use some high-distance sensor fusion, it only prints things smaller than those builtin rails, or it just assumes wheels never lose traction and fails on every print?

How is the adherence of a random household floor? Does it require some kind of wax or it fails on every print?

Again, how is the adherence of a random household floor? Can objects be removed after printing? Because if you expect models to be correct on the first try, you'll fail on every print.

I'm sure I can fix a "why?" somewhere among the questions, but the "how?" is so interesting it would only waste space.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 week ago

That depends.

Is it gonna use the stuff it vacuums up as printing material? Cuz that'd be neat as fuck.

[–] B1naryB0t@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's a step in a new direction, a proof of concept. Maybe in the future something similar could be useful for road work or on mars or idk. No innovation & development without experimenting. You have to start somewhere and with stuff that is available.

And even if nothing comes of it, I bet it was a fun project to work on.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It could lead to a room size print bed, as in i wonder what the largest object it can currently make is.

Would also be neat if it could scan objects in the room as well, a lot more print in place capabilities with an idea like that.

Seems novel, but I agree with you, seems like it could lead to further neat innovation. Though it is pretty wild they chose a vacuum bot lol.

[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Though it is pretty wild they chose a vacuum bot lol.

In engineering school we created a robot that does specific tasks for a contest. It was a lot of work, but that was the main goal. Using an existing device that already has a LIDAR (and probably SLAM) sounds like a very smart move to me, for a project where you want to focus on other problems that have no existing solution yet.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Honestly, If it is ever made to work. A mobile/robotic 3d printer would be a huge step forward. Solving the issue of levelling on more random surfaces, IE all existing surfaces. Plus the Issue of moving heat stability with different plastics. It all sounds doable in an open design way. But hugely complex and in need of this type of nutcase to start it off.

But the advantages it would give to home-maker like design would be freaking huge once things become well understood. Adding already developing multi mateial heads etc.

As I have said elsewhere. Never underestimate the value of someone insane enough to try and make dumb shit work. Almost everything we depend on started from someone thinking the most insane idea would be fun to try.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or hear me out, you print the object and then move it somewhere.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nah, sounds complicated.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The worst ~~of both worlds, good luck getting a decent print on something moving and good luck vacuuming anything with a giant thing on top of it.~~ 3d printer ever. It would be lucky just to not to get caught on anything, never mind printing on uneven surfaces is just asking for a misprint.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm going to assume you decided the extra weight may improve vacuuming in some limited situation.

But thanks for leaving the correction to make me wonder for a while. Made your comment almost enjoyable.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, I actually read the article and realized they ripped the vacuum part out lol

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Lol

I'll go hide my shame

The most believable part of the whole thing. Standard "Tech Incubator" bullshit.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This AI craze has gone too far. Please don't actually produce random AI generated product ideas.