this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
34 points (94.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40266 readers
535 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
34
Home server setup recommendation (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mhz@lemm.ee to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello everyone, My home server (intel nuc6) died on me recently, I set it to be used as my home server using OpensSUSE Leap with the following services:

  • NFS server
  • Sftp over ssh for remote file transfers and I was looking for a faster alternative for local transfers (tftp maybe)
  • Qbittorrent
  • Aria2
  • Emby
  • I was experiencing with nextcloud then pfsense after.
  • Definitely an office suite and a few nextcloud addons.

I have no alternative machine ATM to use it as a replacement but I plan to re-install everything on a VM (Virtualbox or Qemu/libvirt) on my Desktop, I have no experience with containers, but I think installing each service in a countainer would make it easier to move everything later to my new home server.

Would using debian or opensuse and use docker? Maybe even proxmox? or should I just stick with installing everything directly on my distro with no containers? I would love to know your opinion about the best approach.

Edit: I'm containerizing, I like to keep my setup simple, no OSes vertualization since I will be using a 7th or 8th gen low power minipc for my next server (Intel NUC, Hp mini, dell micro or lenovo tiny). I will use proxmox in the VM to get confortable with it and I think the web UI might be easier to use than SSHing to the VM. Later on the new server I will mostly use debain+docker (opensuse leap's futur is cloudy atm) I would still love your suggestions and any guide/tutorial that you think is helpful to read/watch. Thanks everyone.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I firmly am of the mindset of containerizing everything. It may be harder to set up for services that you write yourself or ones that don't already have containers, but as you said, it's so much easier to migrate in the future.

I actually use podman for my services and systemd to manage their lifecycle. For each service, I have a folder that contains the systemd service file (doesn't really work in btrfs systems. You need the service files in the same subvolume as etc or else they won't start at boot) any config files or anything else that needs to be mounted as a volume into my container. I back up the folder that contains all those folder with my nightly backup. If my server craps out, I can restore that directory from my backup, systemctl link and enable all of my service files, and I'm back up to 100%.

[–] mhz@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I considering containerizing everything, except the OS (I'm not ready for immutable OSes yet). I mentioned Docker because it is what I keep finding guides for and which I think is simpler. How is it compared with Podman (for a beginner in containerizing)

Edit: I will mostly use BTRFS and snapshots, and I would definitely put my containers in a separate subvolume to avoid data loss when rolling back.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From a user point of view, podman is mostly identical to docker. Like 98% of the time you can just replace 'docker' with 'podman' and it works. How they work under the hood is very different, though. Podman is designed around running rootless and daemonless. But if you don't care about those things, use docker. Docker supports rootless as well now anyway, but you need to set it up manually. The biggest difference I have found is that podman doesn't support docker-compose, which is extremely popular. Lemmy uses it, for example. There's an additional couple of packages you can install that add support for docker-compose, but then podman uses a daemon, which defeats one of the purposes of using podman in the first place.

My workaround that I use for btrfs and systemd files is to have a folder in /etc with all my service files, then I soft link them to my service's directory. This is just for organization purposes, as a backup wouldn't include the data of the systemd file, just the link to it.

[–] mhz@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Thanks foe explaining, I know podman is rootless. My service where running their own non-login users (qbituser for qbitorrent, emby for emby and so own) and I needed to sudo if I want to change anything. It's not a big deal for me so Docker seems easier to use.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago

I considering containerizing everything, except the OS (I’m not ready for immutable OSes yet)

If you do ever want to script the system but don't want to go full immutable OS, Ansible is very useful. I use it for things like tweaking sysctls, installing common packages like htop and borgbackup, etc. across all my servers.

[–] giacomo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I like proxmox, but it kinda sounds like you'd be just fine with just docker running on opensuse or debian. Or whichever the favorite container is these days (idk why podman is so great, but I seent some posts about people that love it.)

I have tiered out my server with all my app services (jellyfin, nextcloud, etc) running in docker on a debian vm, then have lxc containers for nfs, VPN, etc. Proxmox itself handles ZFS, but I'm sure that's bad practice and there is probably a better way - but it works for me so 🤷.

I've also got a opnsense vm, but not used for any "production" atm; just checking it out to see if I should switch my pfsense box over.

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO containerize everything. Containers save a lot of headaches, and time is valuable. You are correct that moving configurations is trivial with containers. Backing them up and restoring is also easy.

In the meantime you can install whatever you want in a VM - just keep track of the Docker configurations and move them when ready. I like Proxmox, but it may be overkill if you aren't going to have a complex setup. The main selling point would be that you 'containerize' your OS as well, which means you can snapshot it and do various other tricks with running multiple OS's. If your new server will eventually be a NAS, Proxmox can do other neat tricks like running TrueNAS/OpenMediaVault in a VM, or hosting a ZFS pool on Proxmox itself.

If you end up wanting to use Proxmox, you can also use Proxmox within a VM on your current machine to get comfortable in advance.

[–] mhz@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm containerizing everything, I like to keep my setup simple, no OS containerizing since I will be using a low power minipc (NUC, Hp mini, dell micro or lenovo tiny), I will use proxmox in the VM to get an idea on how it works and because I think the web UI might be easier to use than SSHing to the VM. Later on the new server I will mostly use debain+docker.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
LXC Linux Containers
NAS Network-Attached Storage
NUC Next Unit of Computing brand of Intel small computers
SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access
UDP User Datagram Protocol, for real-time communications
VPN Virtual Private Network

6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 8 acronyms.

[Thread #200 for this sub, first seen 8th Oct 2023, 16:45] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm very happy with proxmox. It was easy to learn, the community is great, and at it's plain Debian under the hood.

If I ever rebuild it, I might consider a single VM for all of my docker services. As it stands, I have 5 or 6 VMs running one docker container each. Being new to docker, I wanted as much isolation as I could get in case I borked something. I understand it well enough now that I'd use portainer or something.

My next idea is an LXC running a desktop. I have a 3060 for transcoding and I can share that to as many lxcs as I want. There are security implications with lxc, but again there is lots of material on how to do it. If you have a GPU you can pass through whole hog, it's maybe better or easier to do a VM instead.

[–] mhz@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you would please, why not run the containers on top of Proxmox directly instead of in a VM on top of Proxmod?

[–] thetanis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This actually isn’t a supported method. You don’t want to install anything on top of Proxmox as you run the risk of it being auto removed on an upgrade. You should make a VM and run Docker on that VM.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because I'm new to docker. You're right - that's gotta be more efficient but I've got plenty horsepower.

[–] pete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, for starters, tftp is the wrong thing for local file transfers if you want it to be fast. The only reason its still around is because its simple and offer the only file transfer protocol that is built into the firmware of the network card.

You read that right, its a simple file transfer protocol built into every network card made in the last couple decades.

Your best bet for file transfer is probably something like a WebDAV server. Which next cloud can handle for you. You can just enable normal WebDAV on something like httpd but then you gotta handle authentication yourself. (Or allow local and connect with VPN)

[–] mhz@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the note about tftp. I used to use FTP to transfer file from/to my android phone which got me around ~30MB (local transfer), but abandoned it (due to security reasons) for SSH file transfer which only got me ~8MB for local transfer (my phone probably is slow in decrypting). So, I was thinking of keeping SSH file transfer for remote transfer and use tftp (due to its UDP layer) for local transfer. If webdav offered reasonable local transfer speed, I will use it to replace all the above.

[–] pete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, WebDAV will max your local connection. Its generally not the encryption that makes ssh slow but the fact that it is designed to give real time terminal feedback. In order for you to see each letter typed in an ssh session, the buffers are really small and it intentionally sends a tone of small packets. Great for single characters bad for large file transfer.

Its OK here and then when you need to push a config file or something but moving large files is not really what its designed for and consequently, it sucks.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The easiest thing to do would be to run a VM now and do a V2P backup and restore.

[–] mhz@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the V2P not, if containerizing everything turned to be a headache, I will opt for a normal non-containerized setup with the idea of converting my VM to a physical machine

[–] adonis@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • install proxmox & create VM with favourite distro
  • setup docker & portainer (for gui management)
  • have fun
[–] G4ME@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

portainer is not free to use correct? Alternatively one could use unraid (provides nfs, vms and docker management)

[–] adonis@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

there's a community edition (portainer-ce) which is totally free to use

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

chmod +x avoid-docker.sh; ./avoid-docker.sh

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Forget what everyone says, go for NixOS. This is really something