1185
Right-to-repair is now the law in California (www.theverge.com)
submitted 8 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 128 points 8 months ago

Though there’s a carve-out for game consoles.

That carve out is so blatant, and so obvious, that I'm surprised that actually exists.

It really puts a negative light on the politicians who wrote the law for all of the voters to see.

I really hope there's some investigative reporting as to who wrote the law, and who wrote that clause, so we can identify them easier in the next election cycle.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 94 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Apple: our iPhone is now a game console which happens to be usable as phone

[-] chaosppe@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago

This may seem like a joke, but it won't be next dev conference 😂

[-] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

They're already pushing for more and more current gen games to be released on the iPhone 15. It's pretty much there.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

They literally announced console gaming with the iPhone 15 pro

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 112 points 8 months ago

How long until the Louis Rossmann video that tells us it's all rubbish?

[-] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 84 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He has a video on when it passed in the assembly.

https://youtu.be/NfhFBSraDSM

The only thing he would likely have a problem with it is there is no provision allowing independent 3rd party repairers to use aftermarket parts. This is likely the reason why Apple supported the bill. Apple can continue to charge an arm and a leg for any parts and not supply parts to independent 3rd parties

[-] elouboub@kbin.social 64 points 8 months ago

If Apple supports any "right to repair" bill, it's probably not entirely what you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/NfhFBSraDSM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago

I hope not, since he worked really hard to get it passed.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 45 points 8 months ago

Apparently it's already pretty lacking in that it doesn't give provisions for 3rd party manufactured parts. However I'm not sure if he'll actually do a video for this one, he did one for New York (where he lives) and covered this point already.

[-] Apalacrypto@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

He moved to Austin, TX a while ago. He’s no longer in New York.

[-] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

Not according to NYC /s

[-] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Man NYC is like Argentina of America because how dare you become a citizen of somewhere else

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 90 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

“California is home to a number of device makers, most notably Apple, which came out in support of the bill after initially trying to stall it.”

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

Aka they got whatever carve out they wanted and the bill doesn't cost them money.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It will cost them money, but I'd guess they did the math on whether it was worth it to stop fighting this one and potentially have a bill go through that cost them even more. There are also some things that seem to be carve outs that feel practically written by Apple's lawyers.

Anyway, I will defend Apple against some of the absolute dogshit takes people have about them here, but Apple's stance on repairability and right to repair is absolutely dumb. They spent a not inconsiderable amount of time on the action they're taking to fight climate change and getting the Apple Watch to carbon neutral in the last big keynote and I couldn't help thinking the entire time that if they just made it so that anyone with opposable thumbs could replace the back plate, screen, and battery in 20 minutes or less using tools you can find in any junk drawer, it would do far more than any recycling program or charging during off hours or whatever else.

Ditto for just basic support and software lockouts. Apple is generally pretty good keeping software support (5 years is entirely common) but the arbitrary cut offs are fucking dumb. I have an Apple Watch 3, and they cut software support for that last year which is fine. The form factor has aged out, it was bordering on under-powered a year or two after it launched, and it was time. But I also have a 2015 5k iMac that is just humming along running just fine and that a group of volunteers can get running the latest, no problem. I have no doubt that if that Apple Watch wasn't locked down to hell and back, someone would figure out how to get it running debian or something so it isn't just landfill fodder.

I'd really, really like to see legislation that addresses this. When I pay off a phone at a carrier, I can unlock it and take it where I want. When a manufacturer gives up on supporting that device, they should be required to at minimum unlock it, if not provide source for at least base level of user-space.

[-] micka190@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

There were talks about how Apple was pushing to get some weird wording in the bill a few weeks ago, and people pointed-out how you could probably twist those interpretations to apply to some Apple products.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 65 points 8 months ago

Honestly just open up the laws around reverse engineering and prohibit software blocks that can't be removed for free.

That will cause actual competition in the repair market.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 39 points 8 months ago

And enforce giving root access to device owners if no security updates are provided anymore (e.g. if a exploit is not fixed within x time after gaining knowledge of it)

[-] troydowling@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

Root access should be available from the moment my purchase payment clears. I paid, it's my device.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 12 points 8 months ago

Exactly. If you don't have root, you don't "own" the device. Apps, like bank apps, that refuse to run on devices with root access, (or custom OSs) should be illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Honestly I'd love to have more you ain't selling it laws but hey I'm just a dude who wants to play Majora's mask without having to wear my N64 into dust fr why are we treating retro games like they are currently being sold

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I had a fantasy the other night about making it law that if a company stops selling a software product, "independent distributors" would be allowed to provide functional copies as a public service. The content owners would still own it, the "independent distributors" would not be allowed to profit directly from the items, and if the owner decides to start selling it again, it would need to be removed from the distribution repository so long as it is being sold for a reasonable price with reasonable availability.

Essentially, I want to make ROMs legal to distribute when gaming companies decide they don't want to sell it anymore. Why the fuck is 95% of the NES catalog illegal to obtain. And they can stuff their shit about "losing money" on it. They aren't selling it, they aren't making money.

[-] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

I have a good half dozen vendors that tell me the installer locking down the equipment is a feature, like it's lost on them you can keep customers around by not being a wanker

[-] watcher@nopeeking.link 49 points 8 months ago

Afaik consoles are still exempt, so only a partial victory.

[-] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 23 points 8 months ago

I would bet this is a reason why Apple supported this bill. I bet the iPhone is now classified as a console.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Cell phones are specifically excluded from the definition of "video game console," being instead defined as "general or ... all-purpose computer[s]".

(3) (A) “Electronic or appliance product” or “product” means a product, manufactured for the first time, and first sold or used in California, on or after July 1, 2021, described in subdivision (h), (i), (j), or (k) of Section 9801 of the Business and Professions Code for which the manufacturer makes available tools, parts, and documentation to authorized repair providers, and includes products described in those subdivisions that are sold to schools, businesses, local governments, or in other methods outside of direct retail sale.
(B) “Electronic or appliance product” or “product” does not include any of the following:
(iii) A video game console.

(9) “Video game console” means a computing device, including its components and peripherals, that is primarily used by consumers for playing video games, such as a console machine, a handheld console device, or another device or system. “Video game console” does not include a general or an all-purpose computer, which includes, but is not limited to, a desktop computer, laptop, tablet, or cell phone.

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Cool how the OS of the system defines that. I install Linux on PS5 and now I can sell it as a desktop for more money.

[-] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 36 points 8 months ago

"Though there's a carve-out for games consoles" 🙄

Good on them for the rest of it, though, assuming it isn't total rubbish.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 25 points 8 months ago

Is there anything in the Act that requires the cost of those tools and parts to be reasonable? Yes: "on fair and reasonable terms."

Is there anything that allows third parties to manufacture aftermarket tools and parts? I don't see anything in the Act that specifies that.

Fair and reasonable terms:

(4) “Fair and reasonable terms” means each of the following, as applicable:
(A) At costs and terms that are equivalent to the most favorable costs and terms under which the manufacturer offers the part, tool, or documentation to an authorized repair provider, accounting for any discount, rebate, convenient and timely means of delivery, means of enabling fully restored and updated functionality, rights of use, or other incentive or preference the manufacturer offers to an authorized repair provider.
(B) For documentation, including any relevant updates, that the documentation is made available at no charge, except that, when the documentation is requested in physical printed form, a charge may be included for the reasonable actual costs of preparing and sending the copy.
(C) For tools, that the tools are made available by the manufacturer at no charge and without imposing impediments to access or use of the tools to diagnose, maintain, or repair and enable full functionality of the product, or in a manner that impairs the efficient and cost-effective performance of any such diagnosis, maintenance, or repair, except that, when a tool is requested in physical form, a charge may be included for the reasonable, actual costs of preparing and sending the tool.
(D) If a manufacturer does not use an authorized repair provider, “fair and reasonable terms” means at a price that reflects the actual cost to the manufacturer to prepare and deliver the part, tool, or documentation, exclusive of any research and development costs incurred.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Apple when charging for the “reasonable” costs of mailing tools to people: “we should mail people a 79lb machined aluminum tools that require $50 in shipping and a $1200 deposit.”

[-] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Finally, something that isn't vetoed

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago

They need to ban manufacturers from making exclusive deals with their suppliers.

[-] splonglo@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Hey that's not bad

[-] anubis119@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Up next, Apple deems all of it products one-time-use and completely abandons 1st party repair. They will then make all tools provided to 1st party repairers available to 3rd party repairers and be compliant with this new legislation. Zero tools is the answer unfortunately. More at 11.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Up next, Apple deems all of it products one-time-use and completely abandons 1st party repair.

I'm expecting the day they decide to pot everything in all of their devices in epoxy. Want to repair a MacBook? Tough shit, the whole thing is one solid mass of epoxy - time to buy a new one!

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 12 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Because California is one of the world’s largest economies, this bill may make it easier for people all over the US to repair their devices.

The law, which joins similar efforts in New York, Colorado, and Minnesota, is tougher than some of its predecessors.

Manufacturers must make available appropriate tools, parts, software, and documentation for seven years after production for devices priced above $100.

California is home to a number of device makers, most notably Apple, which came out in support of the bill after initially trying to stall it.

For instance, Google, also headquartered in California, recently confirmed that the Pixel 8 series will get seven years of spare parts — the same number the California bill mandates.

Though the bill is fairly sweeping, there are carve-outs for game consoles and alarm systems.

The original article contains 207 words, the summary contains 133 words. Saved 36%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] nocturne213@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because California is one of the world’s largest economies

Is that for real? I know it is the largest in the States, but in the world?

ETA:

California's GDP in 2022 was $3.6T, representing 14.3% of the total U.S. economy. If California were a country, it would be the 5th largest economy in the world, and more productive than India and the United Kingdom.

Source

[-] King3d@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

If California were a sovereign nation (2022), it would rank in terms of nominal GDP as the world's fifth largest economy, behind Germany and ahead of India.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 10 points 8 months ago

Yeah. California is a powerful state

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

As it should be

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
1185 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

55647 readers
2547 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world