this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024

136 points (99.3% liked)

News

23300 readers

3580 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

dezmd@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

136

60 trees uprooted by vandals, thrown into Mississippi River in St. Paul (kstp.com)

submitted 22 hours ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15292455

The trees were among 250 planted in mid-October by an army of young arborists, paid by Tree Trust for their efforts.

“We spent more than, I’m pretty sure, more than a week on that road,” explains Malick Jenke, among a half-dozen high school grads taking part in Tree Trust’s ‘Branches’ program.

The group of tree planters includes 25 high school students from St. Paul and the ‘Branches’ participants — most of whom are interested in pursuing a green career.

“One tree will take anywhere from a half hour to 45 minutes to get it completely planted, mulched and watered. In some cases, we have to stake those trees as well,” Zumach says.

She notes the value of the destroyed trees adds up to about $12,000, but the City of St. Paul says with labor and other expenses, the costs of the vandalism totals about $40,000.

A spokesperson says replanting the trees is a priority but noted planting season is pretty much at an end.

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

WTF is wrong with people nowadays!

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 hours ago

Like what are the logistics here? It's hard to get trees out of the ground.

Someone did this for 60 trees overnight without get bored? Sounds like hard work to me

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ripping out 60 trees that weigh 30 lbs each in a night? There’s no way this was just some drunk hooligans or something. This was either over money or politics.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Depending on how they “ripped them out” 30lbs is an extreme underestimate.

That’s a lot of friggin work. I hope they had PPE at least 🤷‍♂️/s

Edit: they said 30 lbs in the article lol must be container trees. For how tall those trees are that’s really small root balls though. But still a friggin lot of work!!!

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 56 points 21 hours ago

worthless cunts.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 15 points 17 hours ago

I wonder who they voted for

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 15 points 18 hours ago

That is one of the saddest things I've heard today.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 21 hours ago

America can't have nice things, so I guess it's good that it's going to stop having nice things in that respect.

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

For one second I thought they threw the vandals in the river.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago

They didn't?

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago

They should.

[+] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com -6 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

they had better not put some horrible building contract there

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not sure why you're being down voted. When I lived in Florida I watched a university take advantage of the wreckage of a hurricane aftermath to remove the "debris" with large machines. they removed a bunch of vegetation from the land (which had a conservation easement on it). Then they filed a petition with the government to remove the easement (due to the trees having been removed) so they could put a building in the land.

Nobody gets drunk and simply uproots a few dozen trees. this seems like an effort from some rich group who wants to profit off the land

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

People who would want that land for buisiness purposes could possibly be the ones who uprooted the trees. The thought process being someone who wants the land would cause disruption until the tree planters give up I guess.

Idk just my thoughts on what OP meant though

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 9 hours ago

These were planted alongside trails and on the medians of the road. This is just down the road from my house and the land these trees were on is not useful for literally anything besides trees.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

A few newly planted trees aren't going to be the thing that stops a business from going in if that's what someone wanted to do. There are plenty of hurdles to opening a business, from owning or leasing the land, to business permits, etc, but a few newly planted trees aren't going to stop anyone.