this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
212 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59466 readers
3487 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 hour ago

Not surprised. I switched to AMD CPU and GPU about a year ago. Could not be happier. Ryzen sips power and I run mine in Eco mode (since I'm on an air cooler). Performance is still fantastic.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you look at who is manufacturing silicon, the numbers look even worse for Intel. All of these competitors are using TSMC fabs. AMD, Apple, Qualcomm, etc.

TSMC is the real 500lb gorilla in the room.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It’s gonna suck so hard for the whole world when they get invaded :(

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 5 points 2 hours ago

Pray they don't, but I'm almost certain they will now that the US is appointing complete morons to every portion of the US government. The US won't really be able to help until this rot gets cleaned out. China has four years before we can really help Taiwan again. (Or at least give them air superiority)

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Biden just finalized the Arizona TSMC plant.

If that gets invaded, I think semiconductors are the least of our problems.

[–] chutchatut@lemm.ee 1 points 4 minutes ago

But the Arizona plant wouldn't be allowed to manufacture the most cutting edge chips.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 32 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I just built a computer for a friend and she decided to get an AMD when I told her it was about the same performance but used half as much electricity.

This is a person who knows nothing about computers. Intel is losing their "household name" status in a big way judging by that.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

People like long battery life and computers that don’t cook your crotch.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 3 hours ago

it's the year of the linux des-

oh wait, wrong thread

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 52 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

Amazing what happens when your primary competitor spends 18 months stepping on every rake they can find.

And, then, having run out of rakes, they then deeply invest in a rake factory so they can keep right on stepping on them.

This'll probably be a lot more interesting a year from now, given that the product lines for the next ~9 months or so are out and uh, well.....

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

18 months? Lol.

Intel has been stagnating since the 4th gen Core uarch in 2014 with little competition. They knew they were top dog and they sat on their hands until their hands went numb. There's a reason "14nm++++++++++" was a running joke. This is a decade of monopolistic market behavior finally coming home to roost.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 14 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

That's a wee revisionist: Zen/Zen+/Zen2 were not especially performant and Intel still ran circles around them with Coffee Lake chips, though in fairness that was probably because Zen forced them to stuff more cores on them.

Zen3 and newer, though, yeah, Intel has been firmly in 2nd place or 1st place with asterisks.

But the last 18 months has them fucking up in such a way that if you told me that they were doing it on purpose, I wouldn't really doubt it.

It's not so much failing to execute well-conceived plans as it was shipping meltingly hot, sub-par performing chips that turned out to self-immolate, combined with also giving up on being their own fab, and THEN torching the relationship with TSMC before you launched your first products they're fabbing.

You could write the story as a malicious evil CEO wanting to destroy the company and it'd read much the same as what's actually happening (not that I think Patty G is doing that, mind you) right now.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Zen 2 was only a little slower for gaming, but it cooked the 8 core Intel 9900K in multicore performance. You could stick a 16 core 3950x into a normal mobo. The chiplet was a revolution

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

Its chronic underinvestment in engineering to "maximize shareholder value" for a decade before AMD launched Zen. Then Intel got 5 years behind on engineering, and have only managed to get 2 of those 3 caught up. The newest tile based architecture only just matches the performance of AMD's 3 year old AM4 architecture.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 hours ago

early zen werent performant in lower core count loads, but were extremely competitive in multi core workloads, especially when performamce per dollar was added into the equation. even if one revisits heavy multi core workload benchmarks, they faired fairly well in it. its just at a consumer level, they werent up to snuff yet because in gaming, they were still stuck with developers optimizing for an 8 thread console, and for laptops amds presence was near non existant.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

So you're telling me that milking my 4770k until this year when I built a new rig with AMD was in fact a genius move?

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Perfect market timing.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Basically yeah. Up until Zen 2 intel didn't do much innovating and only around the zen 2 era did those 4th/6th gen chips start to really struggle in modern workloads.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

TBH the only thing that caused me grief with that old beast of an i7 (other that the fact it would have bottlenecked my new GPU) was playing Stellaris.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

All of my computers had been Intel for many many years and here about a year and a half ago I got my first AMD computer because I had seen other people's machines with AMD processors but I had never owned one for myself and so now I do I have one with an AMD Ryzen 5

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I feel like they are dropping the ball in the GPU space though, both on desktop and in servers.

They'renot really leveraging it. They killed the steam deck line of "small core count, GPU heavy APUs" which is why Valve hasn't updated it and competitors seem so power hungry. They all but killed server APUs, making them mega expensive and HPC only. They're finally coming out with a M-Pro like consumer APU, but it took until 2025, and pricing will probably be a joke just like their Radeon Pro GPUs...

And I don't even wanna get into the AI space. They get like 99% there and then go "nah, we don't really care about this market, let Nvidia have their monopoly and screw everyone over." It makes me want to pull my hair out.