this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
362 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

1441 readers
1277 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.

Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
BrikoX@lemmy.zip
362
Elon Musk Says He Owns Everyone's Twitter Account in Bizarre Alex Jones Court Filing (gizmodo.com)
submitted 19 hours ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.zip
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Does it feel like your X account belongs to you and you can do whatever you want with it? That’s not true, according to a new court filing from the social media company formerly known as Twitter. It’s an argument that X is making in order to throw a wrench in The Onion’s recent purchase of InfoWars, the conspiracy theory media company run by Alex Jones. And it’s a great reminder that you don’t actually own what you think you own in the digital age.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 minutes ago

Not supporting Musk here, but there is some truth to the claim in the headline.

One major danger we currently have is everyone thinking that social media platform accounts are property. They simply aren't -- at least, not yours. If the company decides to terminate your account, they can do that. It will be supported by the TOS. You do not own it.

You also don't own data you put on it. Post a bunch of photos to FB? They own them and can do whatever they want with them.

The danger is that these things are so ubiquitous they appear like information utilities, but they are not. They are corporate services wholly owned by their respective corporations. It is something that makes federated systems stand out from the crowd (not that you own an account there either, but there at least is not a single centralized corporate owner).

More people need to be made aware of this.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 15 points 2 hours ago

Elon Musk parody accounts no longer required to advertise themselves as parody, since they really are Elon Musk now.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

It’s days like this that I’m just so happy and proud of myself for never doing the whole Twitter thing.

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

He does though. Read the fine print. You are just allowed to use it. Not really surprising.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

That pic, though: Peak American alpha males.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

It's amazing how many "bro" dudes are riding their dicks.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

You mean rich spoiled man-children who are nothing more than insecure adolescent tweens going through puberty and having sexually frustrated tantrums because girls just laugh at them, and their narcissism is so all-consuming that their only emotion is disdain and goal in all the world is more and more self-gratification and the insatiable pursuit of total control of everything, because they know deep down they will never ever be the recipients of genuine respect or admiration.

Yeah that's what I thought you said. Slight faux pas.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Fake tan. Fake hair.

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 19 points 6 hours ago

It was always this way, on all platforms.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 39 points 8 hours ago

The Onion should allow Musk to block the sale of the Twitter handle, then sue Alex Jones for falsely advertising the sale of an account he can't sell and sue Twitter for infringing on their trademark of the InfoWars brand.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Unrelated but can someone overdose on Ketamine?

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It’s practically impossible sadly. Have to take a absurd amount

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

yes but I think I saw you have to take like 4 grams

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 4 points 12 hours ago

Yes, but that means unconsciousness (and later death).

[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 104 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So if X-itter accounts were to threaten persons or places that were in the interest of the state to protect that responsibility lies on Musk?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 91 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Gee wizz, I don't think you understand Capitalism at all. Musk gets the profits and you get the liability.

[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If only he were also trying to sue advertisers that no longer want to do business with him. It would be the perfect storm of what is good comes to me and what is bad is yours.

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

I still don't understand how the fuck that worked. Why would any company risk doing business with shxitter after that?

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 90 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Time to commit crimes with 'our' Twitter account

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 38 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

upload full length movies on there, newer ones preferably. it's elon's fault since he owns it all.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 5 points 9 hours ago

probably a good tactic

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I hadn't logged into Twitter in years. Just signed in to delete my account. He can have it back.

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

You think it's really deleted in the back end? Adorable

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

...I don't care.

I left Facebook but I left my account a husk. If the last thing they ever know is that I went to Krispy Kreme and got a pumpkin spice donut in 2017, then that's cool with me.

I kept it because occasionally a dude needs a $50 TV and it's the best place to find a used one.

"After eating the donut, the trail goes cold, Mr. Zuckerberg. We just don't know!*

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 1 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

It's cute that you think Facebook only knows things about you if you post them on Facebook lol

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 36 minutes ago

It's cute that you think I even have it installed.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

You missed the point, congrats.

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

No, I don't. But that's another data point for them to see people leaving their service.

[–] ZigZagZebra@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

same, deleted an inactive account.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 60 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They should totally host a mastodon instance at infowars URL

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 11 points 18 hours ago

I've already signed up

[–] superkret@feddit.org 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, if someone lets me into their house, points me to a whiteboard with a pen and tells me to write whatever I want so the other people in the house can read it...
Do I own the whiteboard? Or the pen? Or have control over any of it?

No. The owner of the house can lock me out and wipe off or change what I wrote at their leisure.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago

No but somebody else can own the creator of what was written on the board. That might be a bit weird in today's terms if it's a person, but if it's a company that wrote that stuff it can legally become somebody else's, which is what is happening with Infowars.

Twitter has always allowed a company to own their own account, and even transfer it and be used by multiple people. For example how Biden's account is used by his staff. But now X starts meddling with this specific case, which is very questionable.

And if you're going to say that "it's his own account"; lawyers were saying that his "personal brand" is too heavily intertwined with Infowars and that it should be part of the Infowars brand.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

A better analogy is i hand you a bullhorn and you shout at randos.

Do i own your words, even though it's my bullhorn? No.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Depends, actually.
If you lend it to me privately, no. If you hand it to me on a stage, kinda yes.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago (11 children)

You do have some control, in the form of copyright. Also the analogy doesn’t hold up well since you’re not using their “pen” and they only let you reach inside through the window. And the audience is outside the house.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

And to continue that analogy- Twitter didn't assign the name, the user created it so they hold copyright on the name.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

He does. Same with any other platform you do not “own” your account. You have credentials to login to an account you created.

This should not be news to anyone. This applies to all social media, all entertainment, and every other account you use online.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

Which is why it's really important to have some trust /reputation if using these services.

Why anyone would use a service run by a fascist entitled madman who literally represents the very worst version of humanity is beyond me and they deserve whatever they get.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know why you're getting downvoted, you are correct.

The platform owns the platform.

You have given the platform permission to use anything on the platform however they want.

They own the content you put on the platform.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They own the content you put on the platform.

This will depend on the terms of service agreement. Some of them try to get away with this, while others just give themselves an irrevocable license to use content you publish on their platform.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not mine you faker. I never signed up for any of your crap.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ockHHFfZ3b8&t=11

Sorry. It was my immediate first thought. 😅

load more comments
view more: next ›