this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

news

23649 readers
485 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Very cope heavy article. Keeps calling reusability "copying SpaceX" when one vertical launch vertical landing rocket is going to resemble another just because of physics.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

I just stopped giving a fuck about who is copying whom in general. Everything is derivative, and everybody builds on prior advancements. What matters is actually making cool stuff and advancing humanity.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

LM-12 is an interesting design. On paper it's pretty boring, just another disposable medium-lift kerolox rocket. But it looks pretty well-suited to economical mass production. I'm wondering if LM-12 is quietly planned to replace LM-7. It looks much simpler to assemble for launch and has almost the same capabilities.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cheap mass produced medium lift kerolox is the way to go for most payloads until you nail down reusability. A four engine design seems like it would be hard to modify for reusability though, it'd be tough to throttle it deep enough to land empty.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was thinking the same thing about engine count/placement and throttling. If wikipedia can be believed, the YF-100 engine family can only throttle down to about 65% compared to a Merlin 1D's 40%, and they have about 35% more thrust than a Merlin to start with. Great for launch performance, bad for vertical landings. I think it's a safe bet they'll be sticking to the plan of using LM-10A as their reusability testbed. Same engines but a much bigger rocket with a geometry that has a central engine, like a Falcon 9.

LM-12 does look like a Soyuz-2 killer though, depending on pricing and production rates. It can lift heavier payloads, it launches from a site much closer to the equator, and the biggest Soyuz fairing is smaller than the smallest LM-12 fairing.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, 4 engines suggests a 2x2 layout meaning no center engine so off axis thrust unless you're running at least two of 'em, making that minimum thrust even higher.

Hainan makes a pretty ideal launch site, and I do hope China launches more stuff there.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Versions of the Long March 2, 3, and 4 rockets have been flying since the 1970s and 1980s, burning the same toxic mix of hypergolic propellants as China's early ICBMs.

As opposed to the flowery freedom producing propellants of US rockets

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

the writing is really just amazing