Spaceflight

684 readers

5 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

!spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

llamacoffee@lemmy.world

NASA believes it understands why Ingenuity crashed on Mars (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/spaceflight@sh.itjust.works

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Eleven months after the Ingenuity helicopter made its final flight on Mars, engineers and scientists at NASA and a private company that helped build the flying vehicle said they have identified what probably caused it to crash on the surface of Mars.

In short, the helicopter's on-board navigation sensors were unable to discern enough features in the relatively smooth surface of Mars to determine its position, so when it touched down, it did so moving horizontally. This caused the vehicle to tumble, snapping off all four of the helicopter's blades.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

According to Scott Manley, there might have also been a brown out right about the time of landing, which caused the navigation computer to go away at just the wrong time.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago

Requisite Manley analysis.

Press conference at AGU (American Geophysical Union).

The Ars article mentions "draining the vehicle's power and leading to a loss of communications" but yeah, sounds like the motors pulled too much current in a hard touchdown and the controllers dropped out.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why won’t the put up a Marian and lunar gps constellation?

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So far, probably because of the cost of moving material to Mars orbit

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Surely the cost of continuing to crash rovers due to navigation issues out ways this. It would be more an investment. Humanity seems pretty set on going that direction anyway would be useful for all future missions. And surely we can implement a more light weight version compared to the constellations we currently have have. Since they are a bit old